Florida Panthers at Tampa Bay Lightning, NHL forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with every score and the time left. Above the line favors TB; hover for each play.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
- Mackie SamoskevichGoals1
- Jesper BoqvistAssists1
- Mackie SamoskevichPoints1
- Oliver BjorkstrandGoals1
- Oliver BjorkstrandAssists1
- Oliver BjorkstrandPoints2
Scoring summary
- P315:41
Oliver Bjorkstrand Goal (10) Wrist Shot, assists: none1–6 - P39:50
Mackie Samoskevich Goal (6) Snap Shot, assists: Jesper Boqvist (5), Anton Lundell (24)1–5 - P36:09
Pontus Holmberg Goal (9) Poke, assists: Gage Goncalves (11), Oliver Bjorkstrand (17)0–5 - P217:50
Erik Cernak Goal (1) Wrap-around, assists: Ryan McDonagh (6), Dominic James (8)0–4 - P21:14
Jake Guentzel Goal (26) Wrist Shot, assists: Darren Raddysh (35), Nikita Kucherov (62)0–3 - P114:08
Zemgus Girgensons Goal (7) Backhand, assists: Pontus Holmberg (8), Yanni Gourde (15)0–2 - P12:08
Brandon Hagel Goal (27) Tip-In, assists: Victor Hedman (13)0–1
Turning points
The 5 plays that swung the win chance most, each judged at its own moment: the chance with the score just before it against just after.
- P12:08
Brandon Hagel Goal (27) Tip-In, assists: Victor Hedman (13)FLA 0 – 1 TB · TB 65% → 78% +12TB 65% → 78%+12 pts - P114:08
Zemgus Girgensons Goal (7) Backhand, assists: Pontus Holmberg (8), Yanni Gourde (15)FLA 0 – 2 TB · TB 78% → 88% +10TB 78% → 88%+10 pts - P21:14
Jake Guentzel Goal (26) Wrist Shot, assists: Darren Raddysh (35), Nikita Kucherov (62)FLA 0 – 3 TB · TB 89% → 95% +6TB 89% → 95%+6 pts - P217:50
Erik Cernak Goal (1) Wrap-around, assists: Ryan McDonagh (6), Dominic James (8)FLA 0 – 4 TB · TB 98% → >99% +2TB 98% → >99%+2 pts - P36:09
Pontus Holmberg Goal (9) Poke, assists: Gage Goncalves (11), Oliver Bjorkstrand (17)FLA 0 – 5 TB · TB >99% → >99% +0TB >99% → >99%+0 pts
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Lightning 66%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: NHL favorites the forecast gave 65–70% have won 67.6% of 306 graded games.
- Market
- TB 66%
- ML FLA +180 / TB -218
- Pre-line forecast
- TB 67%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- TB 69%
- Ratings vs. market
- +3.4 pts
- TB: Elo 69.2%, market 65.7%
- Fair odds
- TB -192
- FLA +192 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- FLA 2.3 – 3.2 TB
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 5.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | FLA | TB | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1529 | 1586 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +35 | Worth 35 Elo in the NHL |
| Rest | −30 | — | FLA on the second night of a back-to-back |
| Starting goalies | −11 | +9 | FLA: Daniil Tarasov: team allows 0.27 more goals than with its usual starter (≈35 weighted starts) · TB: Andrei Vasilevskiy: team allows 0.22 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈48 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | TB +141 Elo | TB 69.2% | |
| Market-implied ratings | TB 66.1% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | TB 66.7% | 20% Elo, 80% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | TB 65.7% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Overtime and shootout losses count as losses in these records. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest. Shot share is a team's share of the shots on goal in its games. PDO adds shooting and save percentages: far from 100 tends to even out.
| FLA | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 19th of 323.1 | Goals scored | 3.62nd of 32 |
| 25th of 323.3 | Goals allowed | 2.62nd of 32 |
| 21st of 32−0.2 | Margin | +1.02nd of 32 |
| 5th of 3252.9% | Shot share | 51.8%7th of 32 |
| 29th of 3288.3% | Save percentage | 90.8%5th of 32 |
| 15th of 325–5 | Last 10 | 8–22nd of 32 |
| 7th of 3214–11 | Road vs home | 16–95th of 32 |
| 8th of 321503 | Opponent Elo | 149625th of 32 |
| 6th of 321529 | Elo rating | 15861st of 32 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Puck line | 19–37 | 26–28 |
| Last 10 | 3–7 | 4–6 |
| Favorite | 8–33 | 16–28 |
| Underdog | 11–4 | 10–0 |
| Overs–unders | 33–23 | 27–27 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 7–3 | 3–7 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
FLA 13–7 TB in their last 20 meetings; the forecast called 10 of 20.
- Dec 27
TB 4 @ FLA 2Picked TB 52%Hit - Dec 15
FLA 5 @ TB 2Picked TB 52%Miss - Nov 15
TB 3 @ FLA 1Picked FLA 57%Miss - Apr 30
FLA 6 @ TB 3PlayoffsPicked FLA 51%Hit - Apr 28
TB 2 @ FLA 4PlayoffsPicked FLA 57%Hit - Apr 26
TB 5 @ FLA 1PlayoffsPicked FLA 55%Miss - Apr 24
FLA 2 @ TB 0PlayoffsPicked TB 53%Miss - Apr 22
FLA 6 @ TB 2PlayoffsPicked TB 53%Miss



