Florida Panthers at Tampa Bay Lightning, NHL forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with every score and the time left. Above the line favors TB; hover for each play.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
- Nate SchmidtGoals2
- Brad MarchandAssists1
- Nate SchmidtPoints2
- Nikita KucherovAssists1
- Ryan McDonaghPoints1
Scoring summary
- P35:09
Nate Schmidt Goal (2) Wrist Shot, assists: Matthew Tkachuk (1), Aleksander Barkov (2)6–2 - P213:04
Brayden Point Goal (1) Snap Shot, assists: Ryan McDonagh (1), Gage Goncalves (1)5–2 - P29:44
Matthew Tkachuk Goal (2) Snap Shot, assists: none5–1 - P24:55
Matthew Tkachuk Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: Sam Reinhart (1), Aleksander Barkov (1)4–1 - P24:41
Nate Schmidt Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: Brad Marchand (1), Sam Bennett (1)3–1 - P119:15
Sam Reinhart Goal (1) Tip-In, assists: Dmitry Kulikov (1), Carter Verhaeghe (1)2–1 - P112:21
Jake Guentzel Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: Nikita Kucherov (1), Victor Hedman (1)1–1 - P13:44
Sam Bennett Goal (1) Batted, assists: Mackie Samoskevich (1)1–0
Turning points
The 5 plays that swung the win chance most, each judged at its own moment: the chance with the score just before it against just after.
- P13:44
Sam Bennett Goal (1) Batted, assists: Mackie Samoskevich (1)FLA 1 – 0 TB · FLA 47% → 62% +15FLA 47% → 62%+15 pts - P112:21
Jake Guentzel Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: Nikita Kucherov (1), Victor Hedman (1)FLA 1 – 1 TB · TB 37% → 53% +16TB 37% → 53%+16 pts - P119:15
Sam Reinhart Goal (1) Tip-In, assists: Dmitry Kulikov (1), Carter Verhaeghe (1)FLA 2 – 1 TB · FLA 47% → 65% +17FLA 47% → 65%+17 pts - P24:41
Nate Schmidt Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: Brad Marchand (1), Sam Bennett (1)FLA 3 – 1 TB · FLA 66% → 81% +15FLA 66% → 81%+15 pts - P24:55
Matthew Tkachuk Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: Sam Reinhart (1), Aleksander Barkov (1)FLA 4 – 1 TB · FLA 81% → 91% +10FLA 81% → 91%+10 pts
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Lightning 53%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: NHL favorites the forecast gave 50–55% have won 51.2% of 926 graded games.
- Market
- TB 53%
- ML FLA +105 / TB -125
- Pre-line forecast
- TB 57%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- TB 56%
- Ratings vs. market
- +2.9 pts
- TB: Elo 56.1%, market 53.2%
- Fair odds
- TB -114
- FLA +114 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- FLA 2.7 – 2.8 TB
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 5.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | FLA | TB | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1546 | 1555 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +35 | Worth 35 Elo in the NHL |
| Starting goalies | +14 | +13 | FLA: Sergei Bobrovsky: team allows 0.34 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈47 weighted starts) · TB: Andrei Vasilevskiy: team allows 0.32 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈45 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | TB +43 Elo | TB 56.1% | |
| Market-implied ratings | TB 56.9% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | TB 56.8% | 20% Elo, 80% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | TB 53.2% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Overtime and shootout losses count as losses in these records. Shot share is a team's share of the shots on goal in its games. PDO adds shooting and save percentages: far from 100 tends to even out.
| FLA | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 14th of 323.1 | Goals scored | 3.61st of 32 |
| 6th of 322.7 | Goals allowed | 2.73rd of 32 |
| 10th of 32+0.4 | Margin | +0.92nd of 32 |
| 2nd of 3254.6% | Shot share | 50.3%15th of 32 |
| 10th of 3290.5% | Save percentage | 91.3%2nd of 32 |
| 25th of 323–7 | Last 10 | 5–514th of 32 |
| 14th of 3219–21 | Road vs home | 29–124th of 32 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Puck line | 37–45 | 43–39 |
| Last 10 | 4–6 | 5–5 |
| Favorite | 27–41 | 33–29 |
| Underdog | 10–4 | 10–10 |
| Overs–unders | 37–45 | 38–44 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 3–7 | 6–4 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
FLA 8–4 TB in their last 12 meetings; the forecast called 7 of 12.
- Apr 15
FLA 1 @ TB 5Picked TB 66%Hit - Mar 3
TB 1 @ FLA 2Picked FLA 57%Hit - Dec 23
TB 4 @ FLA 0Picked FLA 58%Miss - Dec 22
FLA 4 @ TB 2Picked FLA 51%Hit - Apr 29
TB 1 @ FLA 6PlayoffsPicked FLA 56%Hit - Apr 27
FLA 3 @ TB 6PlayoffsPicked TB 54%Hit - Apr 25
FLA 5 @ TB 3PlayoffsPicked TB 54%Miss - Apr 23
TB 2 @ FLA 3PlayoffsPicked FLA 56%Hit



