Florida Panthers at Tampa Bay Lightning, NHL forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with every score and the time left. Above the line favors TB; hover for each play.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
- Carter VerhaegheGoals1
- Brad MarchandAssists2
- Brad MarchandPoints2
- Nick PaulGoals1
- Luke GlendeningAssists1
- Nick PaulPoints1
Scoring summary
- P315:36
Sam Reinhart Goal (2) Wrist Shot, assists: none6–3 - P313:02
Eetu Luostarinen Goal (1) Snap Shot, assists: Brad Marchand (4), Anton Lundell (3)5–3 - P215:13
Sam Bennett Goal (3) Wrist Shot, assists: Anton Lundell (2), Eetu Luostarinen (4)4–3 - P29:57
Jake Guentzel Goal (3) Wrist Shot, assists: Victor Hedman (3)3–3 - P20:52
Aleksander Barkov Goal (1) Tip-In, assists: Gustav Forsling (1), Eetu Luostarinen (3)3–2 - P112:16
Nick Paul Goal (2) Snap Shot, assists: Conor Geekie (1)2–2 - P110:06
Anton Lundell Goal (2) Deflected, assists: Brad Marchand (3), Eetu Luostarinen (2)2–1 - P15:21
Carter Verhaeghe Goal (2) Snap Shot, assists: Matthew Tkachuk (2), Sam Reinhart (4)1–1 - P12:33
Gage Goncalves Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: Luke Glendening (1), Victor Hedman (2)0–1
Turning points
The 5 plays that swung the win chance most, each judged at its own moment: the chance with the score just before it against just after.
- P110:06
Anton Lundell Goal (2) Deflected, assists: Brad Marchand (3), Eetu Luostarinen (2)FLA 2 – 1 TB · FLA 51% → 66% +15FLA 51% → 66%+15 pts - P112:16
Nick Paul Goal (2) Snap Shot, assists: Conor Geekie (1)FLA 2 – 2 TB · TB 33% → 49% +16TB 33% → 49%+16 pts - P20:52
Aleksander Barkov Goal (1) Tip-In, assists: Gustav Forsling (1), Eetu Luostarinen (3)FLA 3 – 2 TB · FLA 51% → 68% +17FLA 51% → 68%+17 pts - P29:57
Jake Guentzel Goal (3) Wrist Shot, assists: Victor Hedman (3)FLA 3 – 3 TB · TB 30% → 49% +20TB 30% → 49%+20 pts - P215:13
Sam Bennett Goal (3) Wrist Shot, assists: Anton Lundell (2), Eetu Luostarinen (4)FLA 4 – 3 TB · FLA 51% → 72% +21FLA 51% → 72%+21 pts
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Panthers 51%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: NHL favorites the forecast gave 50–55% have won 51.2% of 926 graded games.
- Market
- FLA 51%
- ML FLA -115 / TB -105
- Pre-line forecast
- FLA 46%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- FLA 46%
- Ratings vs. market
- −4.8 pts
- FLA: Elo 46.3%, market 51.1%
- Fair odds
- FLA -104
- TB +104 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- FLA 2.8 – 2.7 TB
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 5.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | FLA | TB | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1553 | 1547 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +35 | Worth 35 Elo in the NHL |
| Starting goalies | +10 | +7 | FLA: Sergei Bobrovsky: team allows 0.24 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈47 weighted starts) · TB: Andrei Vasilevskiy: team allows 0.17 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈46 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | TB +26 Elo | TB 53.7% | |
| Market-implied ratings | TB 53.5% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | TB 53.6% | 20% Elo, 80% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | FLA 51.1% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Overtime and shootout losses count as losses in these records. Shot share is a team's share of the shots on goal in its games. PDO adds shooting and save percentages: far from 100 tends to even out.
| FLA | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 14th of 323.1 | Goals scored | 3.61st of 32 |
| 6th of 322.7 | Goals allowed | 2.73rd of 32 |
| 10th of 32+0.4 | Margin | +0.92nd of 32 |
| 2nd of 3254.6% | Shot share | 50.3%15th of 32 |
| 10th of 3290.5% | Save percentage | 91.3%2nd of 32 |
| 25th of 323–7 | Last 10 | 5–514th of 32 |
| 14th of 3219–21 | Road vs home | 29–124th of 32 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Puck line | 40–46 | 44–42 |
| Last 10 | 6–4 | 4–6 |
| Favorite | 28–42 | 33–31 |
| Underdog | 12–4 | 11–11 |
| Overs–unders | 40–46 | 41–45 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 5–5 | 8–2 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
FLA 11–5 TB in their last 16 meetings; the forecast called 8 of 16.
- Apr 28
TB 2 @ FLA 4PlayoffsPicked FLA 57%Hit - Apr 26
TB 5 @ FLA 1PlayoffsPicked FLA 55%Miss - Apr 24
FLA 2 @ TB 0PlayoffsPicked TB 53%Miss - Apr 22
FLA 6 @ TB 2PlayoffsPicked TB 53%Miss - Apr 15
FLA 1 @ TB 5Picked TB 66%Hit - Mar 3
TB 1 @ FLA 2Picked FLA 57%Hit - Dec 23
TB 4 @ FLA 0Picked FLA 58%Miss - Dec 22
FLA 4 @ TB 2Picked FLA 51%Hit



