Vancouver Canucks at Edmonton Oilers, NHL forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with every score and the time left. Above the line favors EDM; hover for each play.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
- Ty MuellerGoals1
- Curtis DouglasAssists1
- Ty MuellerPoints1
- Matt SavoieGoals3
- Connor McDavidAssists4
- Connor McDavidPoints4
Scoring summary
- P38:20
Colton Dach Goal (5) Wrist Shot, assists: Connor Murphy (12), Darnell Nurse (17)1–6 - P216:46
Ryan Nugent-Hopkins Goal (20) Batted, assists: Zach Hyman (21), Connor McDavid (90)1–5 - P119:02
Matt Savoie Goal (18) Snap Shot, assists: Connor McDavid (89), Evan Bouchard (74)1–4 - P114:35
Matt Savoie Goal (17) Snap Shot, assists: Connor McDavid (88)1–3 - P112:10
Ty Mueller Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: Curtis Douglas (3), Kevin Lankinen (2)1–2 - P16:48
Matt Savoie Goal (16) Snap Shot, assists: Evan Bouchard (73), Connor McDavid (87)0–2 - P11:58
Josh Samanski Goal (2) Wrist Shot, assists: Colton Dach (8), Evan Bouchard (72)0–1
Turning points
The 5 plays that swung the win chance most, each judged at its own moment: the chance with the score just before it against just after.
- P11:58
Josh Samanski Goal (2) Wrist Shot, assists: Colton Dach (8), Evan Bouchard (72)VAN 0 – 1 EDM · EDM 74% → 85% +10EDM 74% → 85%+10 pts - P16:48
Matt Savoie Goal (16) Snap Shot, assists: Evan Bouchard (73), Connor McDavid (87)VAN 0 – 2 EDM · EDM 85% → 92% +7EDM 85% → 92%+7 pts - P112:10
Ty Mueller Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: Curtis Douglas (3), Kevin Lankinen (2)VAN 1 – 2 EDM · VAN 8% → 16% +8VAN 8% → 16%+8 pts - P114:35
Matt Savoie Goal (17) Snap Shot, assists: Connor McDavid (88)VAN 1 – 3 EDM · EDM 84% → 92% +8EDM 84% → 92%+8 pts - P119:02
Matt Savoie Goal (18) Snap Shot, assists: Connor McDavid (89), Evan Bouchard (74)VAN 1 – 4 EDM · EDM 92% → 97% +5EDM 92% → 97%+5 pts
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Oilers 75%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: NHL favorites the forecast gave 70–75% have won 76.2% of 172 graded games.
- Market
- EDM 75%
- ML VAN +280 / EDM -355
- Pre-line forecast
- EDM 72%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- EDM 72%
- Ratings vs. market
- −2.6 pts
- EDM: Elo 72.2%, market 74.8%
- Fair odds
- EDM -296
- VAN +296 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- VAN 2.5 – 4.0 EDM
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 6.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | VAN | EDM | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1403 | 1525 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +35 | Worth 35 Elo in the NHL |
| Starting goalies | −1 | +8 | VAN: Kevin Lankinen: team allows 0.03 more goals than with its usual starter (≈44 weighted starts) · EDM: Connor Ingram: team allows 0.19 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈32 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | EDM +166 Elo | EDM 72.2% | |
| Market-implied ratings | EDM 72.6% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | EDM 72.5% | 20% Elo, 80% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | EDM 74.8% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Overtime and shootout losses count as losses in these records. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest. Shot share is a team's share of the shots on goal in its games. PDO adds shooting and save percentages: far from 100 tends to even out.
| VAN | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 30th of 322.7 | Goals scored | 3.47th of 32 |
| 32nd of 323.8 | Goals allowed | 3.326th of 32 |
| 32nd of 32−1.2 | Margin | +0.114th of 32 |
| 27th of 3246.8% | Shot share | 52.5%5th of 32 |
| 32nd of 3288.1% | Save percentage | 88.3%30th of 32 |
| 23rd of 324–6 | Last 10 | 6–48th of 32 |
| 26th of 3216–24 | Road vs home | 21–1916th of 32 |
| 18th of 321499 | Opponent Elo | 149532nd of 32 |
| 31st of 321403 | Elo rating | 152510th of 32 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Puck line | 38–43 | 36–45 |
| Last 10 | 5–5 | 9–1 |
| Favorite | 1–9 | 24–39 |
| Underdog | 37–34 | 12–6 |
| Overs–unders | 46–35 | 48–33 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 6–4 | 4–6 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
VAN 9–8 EDM in their last 17 meetings; the forecast called 10 of 17.
- Jan 17
EDM 6 @ VAN 0Picked EDM 62%Hit - Oct 26
EDM 3 @ VAN 4Picked EDM 59%Miss - Oct 11
VAN 1 @ EDM 3Picked EDM 61%Hit - Jan 23
VAN 2 @ EDM 6Picked EDM 61%Hit - Jan 18
EDM 2 @ VAN 3Picked EDM 62%Miss - Nov 9
EDM 7 @ VAN 3Picked EDM 53%Hit - May 20
EDM 3 @ VAN 2PlayoffsPicked VAN 54%Miss - May 18
VAN 1 @ EDM 5PlayoffsPicked EDM 55%Hit



