Boston Bruins at Toronto Maple Leafs, NHL forecast
You didn't pick this one.
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with every score and the time left. Above the line favors TOR; hover for each play.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
- Morgan GeekieGoals1
- Mason LohreiAssists2
- Morgan GeekiePoints2
- Matias MaccelliGoals1
- Morgan RiellyAssists2
- Morgan RiellyPoints2
Scoring summary
- P316:58
Fraser Minten Goal (3) Wrist Shot, assists: Mark Kastelic (2)5–3 - P216:51
John Tavares Goal (8) Wrist Shot, assists: William Nylander (15), Oliver Ekman-Larsson (9)4–3 - P24:41
David Pastrnak Goal (8) Wrist Shot, assists: Hampus Lindholm (3), Morgan Geekie (4)4–2 - P22:15
Michael Eyssimont Goal (4) Wrist Shot, assists: Marat Khusnutdinov (2), Mason Lohrei (7)3–2 - P113:03
Matias Maccelli Goal (4) Wrist Shot, assists: Nicolas Roy (3), Morgan Rielly (10)2–2 - P13:50
Viktor Arvidsson Goal (5) Wrist Shot, assists: none2–1 - P13:30
Morgan Geekie Goal (11) Wrist Shot, assists: Mason Lohrei (6)1–1 - P13:12
Nicholas Robertson Goal (4) Tip-In, assists: Max Domi (2), Morgan Rielly (9)0–1
Turning points
The 5 plays that swung the win chance most, each judged at its own moment: the chance with the score just before it against just after.
- P13:50
Viktor Arvidsson Goal (5) Wrist Shot, assists: noneBOS 2 – 1 TOR · BOS 36% → 51% +15BOS 36% → 51%+15 pts - P113:03
Matias Maccelli Goal (4) Wrist Shot, assists: Nicolas Roy (3), Morgan Rielly (10)BOS 2 – 2 TOR · TOR 46% → 63% +16TOR 46% → 63%+16 pts - P22:15
Michael Eyssimont Goal (4) Wrist Shot, assists: Marat Khusnutdinov (2), Mason Lohrei (7)BOS 3 – 2 TOR · BOS 39% → 57% +18BOS 39% → 57%+18 pts - P24:41
David Pastrnak Goal (8) Wrist Shot, assists: Hampus Lindholm (3), Morgan Geekie (4)BOS 4 – 2 TOR · BOS 58% → 75% +17BOS 58% → 75%+17 pts - P216:51
John Tavares Goal (8) Wrist Shot, assists: William Nylander (15), Oliver Ekman-Larsson (9)BOS 4 – 3 TOR · TOR 17% → 36% +19TOR 17% → 36%+19 pts
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Maple Leafs 64%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: NHL favorites the forecast gave 60–65% have won 62.4% of 599 graded games.
- Market
- TOR 64%
- ML BOS +170 / TOR -200
- Pre-line forecast
- TOR 63%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- TOR 63%
- Ratings vs. market
- −1.2 pts
- TOR: Elo 63.1%, market 64.3%
- Fair odds
- TOR -180
- BOS +180 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- BOS 2.3 – 3.2 TOR
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 5.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | BOS | TOR | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1481 | 1533 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +35 | Worth 35 Elo in the NHL |
| Starting goalies | 0 | +7 | BOS: Jeremy Swayman: team allows 0.01 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈46 weighted starts) · TOR: Anthony Stolarz: team allows 0.17 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈39 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | TOR +93 Elo | TOR 63.1% | |
| Market-implied ratings | TOR 63.5% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | TOR 63.4% | 20% Elo, 80% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | TOR 64.3% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Overtime and shootout losses count as losses in these records. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest. Shot share is a team's share of the shots on goal in its games. PDO adds shooting and save percentages: far from 100 tends to even out.
| BOS | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 13th of 323.3 | Goals scored | 3.72nd of 32 |
| 22nd of 323.3 | Goals allowed | 3.628th of 32 |
| 17th of 32−0.1 | Margin | +0.114th of 32 |
| 29th of 3247.0% | Shot share | 49.2%19th of 32 |
| 17th of 3289.2% | Save percentage | 88.3%29th of 32 |
| 4th of 326–4 | Last 10 | 6–44th of 32 |
| 24th of 322–4 | Road vs home | 7–37th of 32 |
| 5th of 321507 | Opponent Elo | 148729th of 32 |
| 23rd of 321481 | Elo rating | 15338th of 32 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Puck line | 12–4 | 4–10 |
| Last 10 | 8–2 | 2–8 |
| Favorite | 1–2 | 4–9 |
| Underdog | 11–2 | 0–1 |
| Overs–unders | 9–7 | 12–2 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 6–4 | 9–1 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
BOS 9–6 TOR in their last 15 meetings; the forecast called 8 of 15.
- Feb 25
TOR 5 @ BOS 4Picked TOR 59%Hit - Jan 4
BOS 4 @ TOR 6Picked TOR 56%Hit - Nov 5
BOS 0 @ TOR 4Picked TOR 53%Hit - Oct 26
TOR 3 @ BOS 4Picked TOR 52%Miss - May 4
TOR 1 @ BOS 2PlayoffsPicked BOS 56%Hit - May 2
BOS 1 @ TOR 2PlayoffsPicked TOR 54%Hit - Apr 30
TOR 2 @ BOS 1PlayoffsPicked BOS 56%Miss - Apr 27
BOS 3 @ TOR 1PlayoffsPicked TOR 54%Miss



