Skip to content
ShadowCryptsPredictions
Live
MLB games
Updated

Milwaukee Brewers at Pittsburgh Pirates, MLB forecast

Final

Away

Brewers

14-7

2–4

at

Home

Pirates

12-11

MIL 42%PIT 58%

You didn't pick this one.

PNC Park

Win probability

Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors PIT.

PIT75%50%75%MILStart1234567Final

Game center

From the ESPN box score.

Top performers

Brewers
  • Rhys HoskinsBatting1-3, 1 HR, 2 RBI
  • Joe RossPitching5.1 IP, 1 ER, 4 K
Pirates
  • Andrew McCutchenBatting3-4, 1 HR, 1 RBI
  • Jared JonesPitching6.0 IP, 1 ER, 7 K

Scoring summary

  • 8Hoskins grounded out to third, Contreras scored, Miller to second, Adames to third.2–4
  • 8Pitch 2 : Ball In Play2–4
  • 8Pitch 1 : Ball 11–4
  • 6Cruz singled to left, Joe scored and Suwinski scored.1–4
  • 6Pitch 2 : Ball In Play1–4
  • 6Pitch 1 : Ball 11–4
  • 6Hayes scored on error, Suwinski safe at first on throwing error by first baseman Bauers, Joe safe at third on error.1–2
  • 6Pitch 1 : Ball In Play1–2
  • 5Hoskins homered to left center (413 feet).1–1
  • 5Pitch 5 : Ball In Play1–1
  • 5Pitch 4 : Strike 1 Looking0–1
  • 5Pitch 3 : Ball 30–1
  • 5Pitch 2 : Ball 20–1
  • 5Pitch 1 : Ball 10–1
  • 1McCutchen homered to center (414 feet).0–1
  • 1Pitch 3 : Ball In Play0–1
  • 1Pitch 2 : Ball 10–0
  • 1Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking0–0

The pick

Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.

Pirates 58%

LeanHit
MIL 42%PIT 58%

Forecast Elo ratings alone

How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 55–60% have won 55.5% of 2,596 graded games.

Market
PIT 58%
ML MIL +130 / PIT -155
Pre-line forecast
PIT 53%
Elo + market-implied
Elo ratings
PIT 48%
Ratings vs. market
−10.3 pts
PIT: Elo 48.0%, market 58.3%
Fair odds
PIT -140
MIL +140 · the forecast as odds, no margin
Pregame projection
MIL 3.4 – 4.1 PIT
Margin from the forecast, posted total 7.5

How the number is built

Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.

FactorMILPITWhy
Team rating15371482Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average
Home field—+18Worth 18 Elo in MLB
Starting pitchers−17+6MIL: Joe Ross: team allows 0.87 more runs than with its usual starter (≈3 weighted starts) · PIT: Jared Jones: team allows 0.31 fewer runs than with its usual starter (≈3 weighted starts)
Elo ratingsMIL +14 EloMIL 52.0%
Market-implied ratingsPIT 54.3%Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context
Pre-line forecastPIT 53.4%15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend)
ForecastPIT 58.3%Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate

Tale of the tape

This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road.

Try another venue →
Milwaukee Brewers and Pittsburgh Pirates compared, with each team's league rank
MILStatPIT
3rd of 305.7Runs scored4.414th of 30
8th of 304.0Runs allowed4.516th of 30
2nd of 30+1.8Margin−0.118th of 30
3rd of 307–3Last 102–828th of 30
1st of 3010–2Road vs home3–520th of 30

Rating history

Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.

BrewersPirates
140014501500155016001650league averageAprAugDecAprAug

Against the line

How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.

This seasonMILPIT
Run line10–1011–11
Last 105–53–7
Favorite2–62–6
Underdog8–49–5
Overs–unders13–712–10
Overs–unders, last 107–34–6

Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.

Head to head

MIL 8–5 PIT in their last 13 meetings; the forecast called 7 of 13.