Buffalo Sabres at Montreal Canadiens, NHL forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with every score and the time left. Above the line favors MTL; hover for each play.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
- Jack QuinnGoals1
- Mattias SamuelssonAssists1
- Tage ThompsonPoints1
- Cole CaufieldGoals2
- Alexandre CarrierAssists2
- Cole CaufieldPoints2
Scoring summary
- OT0:54
Cole Caufield Goal (5) Snap Shot, assists: none3–4 - P310:12
Tage Thompson Goal (5) Snap Shot, assists: Josh Doan (1), Jiri Kulich (2)3–3 - P29:52
Jack Quinn Goal (5) Snap Shot, assists: Zach Benson (6), Mattias Samuelsson (5)2–3 - P27:39
Alexandre Texier Goal (1) Snap Shot, assists: Kaiden Guhle (1), Alexandre Carrier (3)1–3 - P114:01
Cole Caufield Goal (4) Snap Shot, assists: Juraj Slafkovský (4), Alexandre Carrier (2)1–2 - P111:45
Zachary Bolduc Goal (4) Tip-In, assists: Nick Suzuki (6), Juraj Slafkovský (3)1–1 - P18:21
Josh Norris Goal (2) Snap Shot, assists: Konsta Helenius (1)1–0
Turning points
The 5 plays that swung the win chance most, each judged at its own moment: the chance with the score just before it against just after.
- P18:21
Josh Norris Goal (2) Snap Shot, assists: Konsta Helenius (1)BUF 1 – 0 MTL · BUF 44% → 60% +16BUF 44% → 60%+16 pts - P111:45
Zachary Bolduc Goal (4) Tip-In, assists: Nick Suzuki (6), Juraj Slafkovský (3)BUF 1 – 1 MTL · MTL 40% → 56% +16MTL 40% → 56%+16 pts - P114:01
Cole Caufield Goal (4) Snap Shot, assists: Juraj Slafkovský (4), Alexandre Carrier (2)BUF 1 – 2 MTL · MTL 56% → 71% +16MTL 56% → 71%+16 pts - P310:12
Tage Thompson Goal (5) Snap Shot, assists: Josh Doan (1), Jiri Kulich (2)BUF 3 – 3 MTL · BUF 17% → 47% +31BUF 17% → 47%+31 pts - OT0:54
Cole Caufield Goal (5) Snap Shot, assists: noneBUF 3 – 4 MTL · MTL 52% → 92% +41MTL 52% → 92%+41 pts
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Canadiens 56%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: NHL favorites the forecast gave 55–60% have won 56.4% of 1,035 graded games.
- Market
- MTL 56%
- ML BUF +120 / MTL -142
- Pre-line forecast
- MTL 54%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- MTL 54%
- Ratings vs. market
- −1.9 pts
- MTL: Elo 54.5%, market 56.3%
- Fair odds
- MTL -129
- BUF +129 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- BUF 3.1 – 3.4 MTL
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 6.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | BUF | MTL | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1532 | 1520 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +35 | Worth 35 Elo in the NHL |
| Starting goalies | −3 | +5 | BUF: Ukko-Pekka Luukkonen: team allows 0.08 more goals than with its usual starter (≈48 weighted starts) · MTL: Jacob Fowler: team allows 0.14 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈17 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | MTL +31 Elo | MTL 54.5% | |
| Market-implied ratings | MTL 53.4% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | MTL 53.6% | 20% Elo, 80% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | MTL 56.3% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Overtime and shootout losses count as losses in these records. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest. Shot share is a team's share of the shots on goal in its games. PDO adds shooting and save percentages: far from 100 tends to even out.
| BUF | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 20th of 323.0 | Goals scored | 3.313th of 32 |
| 26th of 323.8 | Goals allowed | 3.927th of 32 |
| 25th of 32−0.8 | Margin | −0.623rd of 32 |
| 11th of 3252.2% | Shot share | 52.4%10th of 32 |
| 29th of 3285.7% | Save percentage | 86.5%27th of 32 |
| 16th of 321–2 | Road vs home | 2–216th of 32 |
| 17th of 321502 | Opponent Elo | 151012th of 32 |
| 7th of 321532 | Elo rating | 152012th of 32 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Puck line | 4–4 | 2–5 |
| Last 10 | 4–4 | 2–5 |
| Favorite | 1–2 | 0–4 |
| Underdog | 3–2 | 2–1 |
| Overs–unders | 5–3 | 5–2 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 5–3 | 5–2 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
BUF 7–13 MTL in their last 20 meetings; the forecast called 5 of 20.
- Oct 13
BUF 3 @ MTL 4Picked MTL 58%Hit - May 18
MTL 3 @ BUF 2PlayoffsPicked BUF 52%Miss - May 16
BUF 8 @ MTL 3PlayoffsPicked MTL 61%Miss - May 14
MTL 6 @ BUF 3PlayoffsPicked BUF 52%Miss - May 12
BUF 3 @ MTL 2PlayoffsPicked MTL 57%Miss - May 10
BUF 2 @ MTL 6PlayoffsPicked MTL 55%Hit - May 8
MTL 5 @ BUF 1PlayoffsPicked BUF 59%Miss - May 6
MTL 2 @ BUF 4PlayoffsPicked BUF 56%Hit



