Vancouver Canucks at Nashville Predators, NHL forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with every score and the time left. Above the line favors NSH; hover for each play.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
- Brock BoeserGoals2
- Elias PetterssonAssists2
- Brock BoeserPoints3
- Filip ForsbergGoals1
- Luke EvangelistaAssists2
- Filip ForsbergPoints2
Scoring summary
- OT4:58
Brock Boeser Goal (6) Backhand, assists: Elias Pettersson (7)5–4 - P316:37
Nick Blankenburg Goal (1) Slap Shot, assists: Matthew Wood (3), Michael Bunting (5)4–4 - P311:52
Michael Bunting Goal (4) Deflected, assists: Spencer Stastney (5), Fedor Svechkov (1)4–3 - P33:02
Evander Kane Goal (2) Snap Shot, assists: Linus Karlsson (3), Marcus Pettersson (3)4–2 - P218:45
Erik Haula Goal (3) Snap Shot, assists: Filip Forsberg (5), Luke Evangelista (7)3–2 - P215:05
Brock Boeser Goal (5) Snap Shot, assists: Tom Willander (1), Elias Pettersson (2)3–1 - P212:57
Jake DeBrusk Goal (3) Tip-In, assists: Brock Boeser (3), Elias Pettersson (6)2–1 - P114:45
Evander Kane Goal (1) Slap Shot, assists: Filip Hronek (7), Arshdeep Bains (3)1–1 - P16:47
Filip Forsberg Goal (6) Wrist Shot, assists: Brady Skjei (4), Luke Evangelista (6)0–1
Turning points
The 5 plays that swung the win chance most, each judged at its own moment: the chance with the score just before it against just after.
- P114:45
Evander Kane Goal (1) Slap Shot, assists: Filip Hronek (7), Arshdeep Bains (3)VAN 1 – 1 NSH · VAN 34% → 50% +16VAN 34% → 50%+16 pts - P212:57
Jake DeBrusk Goal (3) Tip-In, assists: Brock Boeser (3), Elias Pettersson (6)VAN 2 – 1 NSH · VAN 50% → 71% +21VAN 50% → 71%+21 pts - P33:02
Evander Kane Goal (2) Snap Shot, assists: Linus Karlsson (3), Marcus Pettersson (3)VAN 4 – 2 NSH · VAN 75% → 92% +16VAN 75% → 92%+16 pts - P316:37
Nick Blankenburg Goal (1) Slap Shot, assists: Matthew Wood (3), Michael Bunting (5)VAN 4 – 4 NSH · NSH 6% → 50% +44NSH 6% → 50%+44 pts - OT4:58
Brock Boeser Goal (6) Backhand, assists: Elias Pettersson (7)VAN 5 – 4 NSH · VAN 50% → 100% +50VAN 50% → 100%+50 pts
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Predators 50%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: NHL favorites the forecast gave 50–55% have won 51.2% of 926 graded games.
- Market
- NSH 50%
- ML VAN -110 / NSH -110
- Pre-line forecast
- NSH 52%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- NSH 50%
- Ratings vs. market
- −0.3 pts
- NSH: Elo 49.7%, market 50.0%
- Fair odds
- NSH -100
- VAN -100 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- VAN 2.8 – 2.8 NSH
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 5.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | VAN | NSH | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1489 | 1456 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +35 | Worth 35 Elo in the NHL |
| Starting goalies | +5 | +1 | VAN: Thatcher Demko: team allows 0.12 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈40 weighted starts) · NSH: Juuse Saros: team allows 0.02 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈47 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | VAN +2 Elo | VAN 50.3% | |
| Market-implied ratings | NSH 52.5% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | NSH 52.0% | 20% Elo, 80% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | NSH 50.0% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Overtime and shootout losses count as losses in these records. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest. Shot share is a team's share of the shots on goal in its games. PDO adds shooting and save percentages: far from 100 tends to even out.
| VAN | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 27th of 322.7 | Goals scored | 2.530th of 32 |
| 19th of 323.2 | Goals allowed | 3.323rd of 32 |
| 26th of 32−0.5 | Margin | −0.828th of 32 |
| 31st of 3245.3% | Shot share | 47.8%23rd of 32 |
| 10th of 3290.5% | Save percentage | 89.7%17th of 32 |
| 15th of 325–5 | Last 10 | 3–729th of 32 |
| 12th of 324–4 | Road vs home | 4–420th of 32 |
| 18th of 321497 | Opponent Elo | 15069th of 32 |
| 21st of 321489 | Elo rating | 145630th of 32 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Puck line | 7–6 | 6–7 |
| Last 10 | 6–4 | 4–6 |
| Favorite | 1–3 | 1–3 |
| Underdog | 6–3 | 5–4 |
| Overs–unders | 8–5 | 5–8 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 6–4 | 5–5 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
VAN 8–5 NSH in their last 13 meetings; the forecast called 5 of 13.
- Oct 23
VAN 1 @ NSH 2Picked NSH 53%Hit - Jan 29
VAN 3 @ NSH 1Picked NSH 57%Miss - Jan 3
NSH 3 @ VAN 0Picked NSH 63%Hit - Nov 17
NSH 5 @ VAN 3Picked NSH 54%Hit - May 3
VAN 1 @ NSH 0PlayoffsPicked NSH 55%Miss - Apr 30
NSH 2 @ VAN 1PlayoffsPicked VAN 55%Miss - Apr 28
VAN 4 @ NSH 3PlayoffsPicked NSH 55%Miss - Apr 26
VAN 2 @ NSH 1PlayoffsPicked NSH 55%Miss



