Nashville Predators at Vancouver Canucks, NHL forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with every score and the time left. Above the line favors VAN; hover for each play.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
- Steven StamkosGoals2
- Roman JosiAssists1
- Steven StamkosPoints2
- Kiefer SherwoodGoals1
- Erik BrannstromAssists1
- Kiefer SherwoodPoints1
Scoring summary
- P319:39
Gustav Nyquist Goal (6) Wrist Shot, assists: none5–3 - P314:00
Kiefer Sherwood Goal (4) Wrist Shot, assists: Danton Heinen (7), Tyler Myers (3)4–3 - P219:38
Steven Stamkos Goal (6) Wrist Shot, assists: Jonathan Marchessault (7), Filip Forsberg (7)4–2 - P214:21
Roman Josi Goal (2) Slap Shot, assists: Brady Skjei (5), Filip Forsberg (6)3–2 - P212:17
Steven Stamkos Goal (5) Wrist Shot, assists: Roman Josi (12), Ryan O'Reilly (8)2–2 - P29:51
Elias Pettersson Goal (6) Slap Shot, assists: Quinn Hughes (15), Conor Garland (9)1–2 - P111:34
Aatu Raty Goal (1) Tip-In, assists: Erik Brannstrom (4), Danton Heinen (6)1–1 - P15:28
Zachary L'Heureux Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: Cole Smith (2), Michael McCarron (2)1–0
Turning points
The 5 plays that swung the win chance most, each judged at its own moment: the chance with the score just before it against just after.
- P111:34
Aatu Raty Goal (1) Tip-In, assists: Erik Brannstrom (4), Danton Heinen (6)NSH 1 – 1 VAN · VAN 31% → 46% +15VAN 31% → 46%+15 pts - P29:51
Elias Pettersson Goal (6) Slap Shot, assists: Quinn Hughes (15), Conor Garland (9)NSH 1 – 2 VAN · VAN 47% → 67% +20VAN 47% → 67%+20 pts - P212:17
Steven Stamkos Goal (5) Wrist Shot, assists: Roman Josi (12), Ryan O'Reilly (8)NSH 2 – 2 VAN · NSH 32% → 53% +21NSH 32% → 53%+21 pts - P214:21
Roman Josi Goal (2) Slap Shot, assists: Brady Skjei (5), Filip Forsberg (6)NSH 3 – 2 VAN · NSH 53% → 74% +21NSH 53% → 74%+21 pts - P219:38
Steven Stamkos Goal (6) Wrist Shot, assists: Jonathan Marchessault (7), Filip Forsberg (7)NSH 4 – 2 VAN · NSH 75% → 91% +15NSH 75% → 91%+15 pts
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Predators 54%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: NHL favorites the forecast gave 50–55% have won 51.2% of 926 graded games.
- Market
- NSH 54%
- ML NSH -130 / VAN +110
- Pre-line forecast
- NSH 48%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- NSH 45%
- Ratings vs. market
- −9.1 pts
- NSH: Elo 45.2%, market 54.3%
- Fair odds
- NSH -119
- VAN +119 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- NSH 2.9 – 2.6 VAN
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 5.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | NSH | VAN | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1493 | 1524 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +35 | Worth 35 Elo in the NHL |
| Rest | — | −30 | VAN on the second night of a back-to-back |
| Starting goalies | +3 | 0 | NSH: Juuse Saros: team allows 0.08 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈40 weighted starts) · VAN: Kevin Lankinen: team allows 0.01 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈22 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | VAN +33 Elo | VAN 54.8% | |
| Market-implied ratings | VAN 51.5% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | VAN 52.2% | 20% Elo, 80% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | NSH 54.3% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Overtime and shootout losses count as losses in these records. Shot share is a team's share of the shots on goal in its games. PDO adds shooting and save percentages: far from 100 tends to even out.
| NSH | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 32nd of 322.3 | Goals scored | 3.215th of 32 |
| 21st of 323.2 | Goals allowed | 3.117th of 32 |
| 28th of 32−0.9 | Margin | +0.114th of 32 |
| 14th of 3250.6% | Shot share | 50.4%16th of 32 |
| 17th of 3290.3% | Save percentage | 89.4%20th of 32 |
| 32nd of 322–8 | Last 10 | 6–47th of 32 |
| 31st of 321–7 | Road vs home | 3–630th of 32 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Puck line | 8–10 | 7–9 |
| Last 10 | 6–4 | 5–5 |
| Favorite | 3–8 | 6–7 |
| Underdog | 5–2 | 1–2 |
| Overs–unders | 6–12 | 7–9 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 2–8 | 5–5 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
NSH 2–7 VAN in their last 9 meetings; the forecast called 2 of 9.
- May 3
VAN 1 @ NSH 0PlayoffsPicked NSH 55%Miss - Apr 30
NSH 2 @ VAN 1PlayoffsPicked VAN 55%Miss - Apr 28
VAN 4 @ NSH 3PlayoffsPicked NSH 55%Miss - Apr 26
VAN 2 @ NSH 1PlayoffsPicked NSH 55%Miss - Apr 23
NSH 4 @ VAN 1PlayoffsPicked VAN 55%Miss - Apr 21
NSH 2 @ VAN 4PlayoffsPicked VAN 56%Hit - Dec 19
VAN 5 @ NSH 2Picked NSH 55%Miss - Oct 31
NSH 2 @ VAN 5Picked VAN 56%Hit



