Athletics at Houston Astros, MLB forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors HOU.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
Athletics- Jeff McNeilBatting1-4
- J.T. GinnPitching5.0 IP, 3 ER, 4 K
Astros- Yordan AlvarezBatting2-3, 2 RBI
- Hayden WesneskiPitching5.0 IP, 0 ER, 4 K
Scoring summary
- 7Alvarez doubled to shortstop, Delgado scored.0–4
- 5Paredes doubled to right, Alvarez scored.0–3
- 5Alvarez doubled to center, Allen scored.0–2
- 4Walker hit sacrifice fly to center, Paredes scored.0–1
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Astros 63%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 60–65% have won 61.6% of 1,194 graded games.
- Market
- HOU 63%
- ML ATH +163 / HOU -176
- Pre-line forecast
- HOU 63%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- HOU 58%
- Ratings vs. market
- −4.9 pts
- HOU: Elo 57.7%, market 62.6%
- Fair odds
- HOU -168
- ATH +168 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- ATH 3.7 – 4.8 HOU
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 8.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | ATH | HOU | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1430 | 1494 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +18 | Worth 18 Elo in MLB |
| Starting pitchers | +24 | −3 | ATH: J.T. Ginn: team allows 1.21 fewer runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts) · HOU: Hayden Wesneski: team allows 0.14 more runs than with its usual starter (≈9 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | HOU +54 Elo | HOU 57.7% | |
| Market-implied ratings | HOU 64.4% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | HOU 63.4% | 15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | HOU 62.6% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest.
| ATH | Stat | HOU |
|---|---|---|
| 20th of 304.4 | Runs scored | 4.610th of 30 |
| 30th of 305.8 | Runs allowed | 4.925th of 30 |
| 30th of 30−1.4 | Margin | −0.421st of 30 |
| 29th of 302–8 | Last 10 | 4–619th of 30 |
| 25th of 3026–39 | Road vs home | 32–3321st of 30 |
| 21st of 301499 | Opponent Elo | 149030th of 30 |
| 29th of 301430 | Elo rating | 149418th of 30 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season |  ATH |  HOU |
|---|---|---|
| Run line | 59–69 | 65–63 |
| Last 10 | 3–7 | 2–8 |
| Favorite | 11–28 | 23–36 |
| Underdog | 48–41 | 42–27 |
| Overs–unders | 63–59–6 | 67–54–7 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 6–3–1 | 4–5–1 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
ATH 19–26 HOU in their last 45 meetings; the forecast called 28 of 45.