Colorado Rockies at Los Angeles Dodgers, MLB forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors LAD.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
- Kyle FarmerBatting0-2, 1 RBI
- Chase DollanderPitching5.0 IP, 1 ER, 5 K
- Mookie BettsBatting1-4, 2 RBI
- Tyler GlasnowPitching7.0 IP, 1 ER, 11 K
Scoring summary
- 7
Betts singled to center, Pages scored and Ohtani scored.1–3 - 6
Freeman doubled to right, Rortvedt scored, Ohtani to third.1–1 - 2
Farmer hit sacrifice fly to left, Beck scored.1–0
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Dodgers 76%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 75–80% have won 76.7% of 30 graded games.
- Market
- LAD 76%
- ML COL +295 / LAD -375
- Pre-line forecast
- LAD 75%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- LAD 74%
- Ratings vs. market
- −2.0 pts
- LAD: Elo 73.7%, market 75.7%
- Fair odds
- LAD -312
- COL +312 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- COL 3.0 – 5.5 LAD
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 8.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | COL | LAD | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1379 | 1543 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +18 | Worth 18 Elo in MLB |
| Starting pitchers | +2 | −2 | COL: Chase Dollander: team allows 0.10 fewer runs than with its usual starter (≈9 weighted starts) · LAD: Tyler Glasnow: team allows 0.10 more runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | LAD +179 Elo | LAD 73.7% | |
| Market-implied ratings | LAD 75.1% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | LAD 74.9% | 15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | LAD 75.7% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest.
| COL | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 29th of 303.8 | Runs scored | 5.03rd of 30 |
| 30th of 306.4 | Runs allowed | 4.417th of 30 |
| 30th of 30−2.6 | Margin | +0.76th of 30 |
| 30th of 302–8 | Last 10 | 3–726th of 30 |
| 30th of 3017–51 | Road vs home | 45–265th of 30 |
| 1st of 301510 | Opponent Elo | 149528th of 30 |
| 30th of 301379 | Elo rating | 15434th of 30 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Run line | 69–74 | 59–84 |
| Last 10 | 4–6 | 2–8 |
| Favorite | 2–4 | 46–75 |
| Underdog | 67–70 | 13–9 |
| Overs–unders | 64–79 | 71–72 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 5–5 | 2–8 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
COL 8–28 LAD in their last 36 meetings; the forecast called 28 of 36.



