Toronto Maple Leafs at Boston Bruins, NHL forecast
You didn't pick this one.
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with every score and the time left. Above the line favors BOS; hover for each play.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
- Oliver Ekman-LarssonGoals1
- Max DomiAssists1
- Oliver Ekman-LarssonPoints1
- David PastrnakGoals2
- Charlie McAvoyAssists2
- David PastrnakPoints3
Scoring summary
- P39:48
David Pastrnak Goal (10) Wrist Shot, assists: Mark Kastelic (3), Tanner Jeannot (5)3–5 - P33:32
Oliver Ekman-Larsson Goal (2) Snap Shot, assists: Nicholas Robertson (6), William Nylander (16)3–4 - P218:58
Bobby McMann Goal (4) Backhand, assists: Max Domi (3), Morgan Rielly (12)2–4 - P20:49
David Pastrnak Goal (9) Wrist Shot, assists: Morgan Geekie (5), Charlie McAvoy (14)1–4 - P117:23
Alex Steeves Goal (1) Snap Shot, assists: Hampus Lindholm (4)1–3 - P19:32
Hampus Lindholm Goal (1) Snap Shot, assists: Mason Lohrei (8), Michael Eyssimont (5)1–2 - P16:41
Steven Lorentz Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: none1–1 - P14:27
Pavel Zacha Goal (5) Deflected, assists: David Pastrnak (12), Charlie McAvoy (13)0–1
Turning points
The 5 plays that swung the win chance most, each judged at its own moment: the chance with the score just before it against just after.
- P14:27
Pavel Zacha Goal (5) Deflected, assists: David Pastrnak (12), Charlie McAvoy (13)TOR 0 – 1 BOS · BOS 45% → 60% +15BOS 45% → 60%+15 pts - P16:41
Steven Lorentz Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: noneTOR 1 – 1 BOS · TOR 40% → 55% +15TOR 40% → 55%+15 pts - P19:32
Hampus Lindholm Goal (1) Snap Shot, assists: Mason Lohrei (8), Michael Eyssimont (5)TOR 1 – 2 BOS · BOS 45% → 61% +16BOS 45% → 61%+16 pts - P33:32
Oliver Ekman-Larsson Goal (2) Snap Shot, assists: Nicholas Robertson (6), William Nylander (16)TOR 3 – 4 BOS · TOR 9% → 27% +17TOR 9% → 27%+17 pts - P39:48
David Pastrnak Goal (10) Wrist Shot, assists: Mark Kastelic (3), Tanner Jeannot (5)TOR 3 – 5 BOS · BOS 80% → 96% +16BOS 80% → 96%+16 pts
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Maple Leafs 55%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: NHL favorites the forecast gave 55–60% have won 56.4% of 1,035 graded games.
- Market
- TOR 55%
- ML TOR -135 / BOS +115
- Pre-line forecast
- TOR 53%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- TOR 51%
- Ratings vs. market
- −3.9 pts
- TOR: Elo 51.3%, market 55.3%
- Fair odds
- TOR -124
- BOS +124 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- TOR 2.9 – 2.6 BOS
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 5.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | TOR | BOS | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1525 | 1486 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +35 | Worth 35 Elo in the NHL |
| Starting goalies | +6 | +1 | TOR: Anthony Stolarz: team allows 0.15 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈39 weighted starts) · BOS: Jeremy Swayman: team allows 0.02 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈46 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | TOR +9 Elo | TOR 51.3% | |
| Market-implied ratings | TOR 53.9% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | TOR 53.4% | 20% Elo, 80% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | TOR 55.3% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Overtime and shootout losses count as losses in these records. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest. Shot share is a team's share of the shots on goal in its games. PDO adds shooting and save percentages: far from 100 tends to even out.
| TOR | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 5th of 323.7 | Goals scored | 3.48th of 32 |
| 31st of 323.8 | Goals allowed | 3.322nd of 32 |
| 16th of 32−0.1 | Margin | +0.114th of 32 |
| 27th of 3247.5% | Shot share | 47.5%29th of 32 |
| 27th of 3288.3% | Save percentage | 89.3%22nd of 32 |
| 13th of 325–5 | Last 10 | 7–32nd of 32 |
| 28th of 321–3 | Road vs home | 7–37th of 32 |
| 28th of 321489 | Opponent Elo | 15103rd of 32 |
| 9th of 321525 | Elo rating | 148623rd of 32 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Puck line | 5–11 | 13–4 |
| Last 10 | 3–7 | 8–2 |
| Favorite | 4–10 | 1–2 |
| Underdog | 1–1 | 12–2 |
| Overs–unders | 14–2 | 10–7 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 10–0 | 7–3 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
TOR 6–10 BOS in their last 16 meetings; the forecast called 8 of 16.
- Nov 8
BOS 5 @ TOR 3Picked TOR 64%Miss - Feb 25
TOR 5 @ BOS 4Picked TOR 59%Hit - Jan 4
BOS 4 @ TOR 6Picked TOR 56%Hit - Nov 5
BOS 0 @ TOR 4Picked TOR 53%Hit - Oct 26
TOR 3 @ BOS 4Picked TOR 52%Miss - May 4
TOR 1 @ BOS 2PlayoffsPicked BOS 56%Hit - May 2
BOS 1 @ TOR 2PlayoffsPicked TOR 54%Hit - Apr 30
TOR 2 @ BOS 1PlayoffsPicked BOS 56%Miss



