Athletics at Cincinnati Reds, MLB forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors CIN.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
Athletics- Lawrence ButlerBatting1-4, 1 HR, 1 RBI
- Jacob LopezPitching5.0 IP, 2 ER, 9 K
Reds- Matt McLainBatting1-3, 1 HR, 1 RBI
- Rhett LowderPitching6.0 IP, 2 ER, 3 K
Scoring summary
- 6Marte hit sacrifice fly to right, Stewart scored.2–3
- 6Heim doubled to right, Soderstrom scored.2–2
- 5McLain homered to right center (378 feet).1–2
- 2Trevino singled to left, Marte scored.1–1
- 1Butler homered to right center (415 feet).1–0
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Reds 61%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 60–65% have won 61.6% of 1,194 graded games.
- Market
- CIN 61%
- ML ATH +154 / CIN -164
- Pre-line forecast
- CIN 57%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- CIN 58%
- Ratings vs. market
- −3.1 pts
- CIN: Elo 58.1%, market 61.2%
- Fair odds
- CIN -158
- ATH +158 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- ATH 4.2 – 5.3 CIN
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 9.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | ATH | CIN | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1437 | 1484 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +18 | Worth 18 Elo in MLB |
| Starting pitchers | −2 | −9 | ATH: Jacob Lopez: team allows 0.10 more runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts) · CIN: Rhett Lowder: team allows 0.47 more runs than with its usual starter (≈9 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | CIN +57 Elo | CIN 58.1% | |
| Market-implied ratings | CIN 56.4% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | CIN 56.6% | 15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | CIN 61.2% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest.
| ATH | Stat | CIN |
|---|---|---|
| 20th of 304.3 | Runs scored | 4.222nd of 30 |
| 29th of 305.7 | Runs allowed | 4.721st of 30 |
| 30th of 30−1.4 | Margin | −0.626th of 30 |
| 30th of 301–9 | Last 10 | 6–47th of 30 |
| 23rd of 3024–32 | Road vs home | 27–3125th of 30 |
| 22nd of 301498 | Opponent Elo | 150110th of 30 |
| 29th of 301437 | Elo rating | 148423rd of 30 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season |  ATH |  CIN |
|---|---|---|
| Run line | 52–61 | 58–54 |
| Last 10 | 3–7 | 5–5 |
| Favorite | 11–28 | 16–23 |
| Underdog | 41–33 | 42–31 |
| Overs–unders | 54–54–5 | 59–51–2 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 4–5–1 | 3–6–1 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
ATH 6–4 CIN in their last 10 meetings; the forecast called 5 of 10.
