Skip to content
ShadowCryptsPredictions
Live
MLB games
Updated

Tampa Bay Rays at Chicago White Sox, MLB forecast

FinalMLB.TV, Rays.TV, CHSN

Away

Rays

9-7

8–5

at

Home

White Sox

6-11

TB 56%CHW 44%

You didn't pick this one.

Rate Field · MLB.TV, Rays.TV, CHSN

Win probability

Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors CHW.

CHW75%50%75%TBStart12345678Final

Game center

From the ESPN box score.

Top performers

Rays
  • Ben WilliamsonBatting2-3, 3 RBI
  • Shane McClanahanPitching5.0 IP, 2 ER, 4 K
White Sox
  • Everson PereiraBatting1-4, 1 HR, 3 RBI
  • Noah SchultzPitching4.1 IP, 3 ER, 4 K

Scoring summary

  • 9Murakami homered to right (398 feet), Vargas scored.8–5
  • 7DeLuca doubled to left, Williamson scored.8–3
  • 7Williamson doubled to center, Vilade scored.7–3
  • 6Díaz singled to center, Fortes scored, Walls to third.6–3
  • 6Fortes reached on infield single to third, Williamson scored.5–3
  • 3Pereira homered to left center (416 feet), Meidroth scored and Murakami scored.4–3
  • 3Williamson doubled to left, Vilade scored.4–0
  • 1Williamson hit sacrifice bunt, Caminero scored and Vilade scored on throwing error by pitcher Schultz, Williamson to second.3–0
  • 1Vilade doubled to left, Aranda scored, Caminero to third.1–0

The pick

Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.

Rays 56%

LeanHit
TB 56%CHW 44%

Forecast Elo ratings alone

How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 55–60% have won 55.5% of 2,596 graded games.

Market
TB 56%
ML TB -142 / CHW +117
Pre-line forecast
TB 57%
Elo + market-implied
Elo ratings
TB 56%
Ratings vs. market
−0.4 pts
TB: Elo 55.6%, market 56.0%
Fair odds
TB -127
CHW +127 · the forecast as odds, no margin
Pregame projection
TB 4.3 – 3.7 CHW
Margin from the forecast, posted total 8

How the number is built

Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.

FactorTBCHWWhy
Team rating14981446Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average
Home field—+18Worth 18 Elo in MLB
Starting pitchers+8+2TB: Shane McClanahan: team allows 0.40 fewer runs than with its usual starter (≈9 weighted starts) · CHW: Noah Schultz (no track record yet)
Elo ratingsTB +39 EloTB 55.6%
Market-implied ratingsTB 57.7%Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context
Pre-line forecastTB 57.4%15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend)
ForecastTB 56.0%Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate

Tale of the tape

This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest.

Try another venue →
Tampa Bay Rays and Chicago White Sox compared, with each team's league rank
TBStatCHW
11th of 304.7Runs scored3.129th of 30
26th of 305.3Runs allowed4.923rd of 30
22nd of 30−0.7Margin−1.930th of 30
6th of 306–4Last 105–512th of 30
19th of 304–5Road vs home3–316th of 30
8th of 301513Opponent Elo150611th of 30
18th of 301498Elo rating144629th of 30

Rating history

Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.

RaysWhite Sox
135014001450150015501600league averageAprAugDecAprAug

Against the line

How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.

This seasonTBCHW
Run line9–67–9
Last 106–46–4
Favorite3–3—
Underdog6–37–9
Overs–unders10–3–29–7
Overs–unders, last 106–2–24–6

Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.

Head to head

TB 10–9 CHW in their last 19 meetings; the forecast called 10 of 19.