Skip to content
ShadowCryptsPredictions
Live
MLB games
Updated

Los Angeles Angels at Athletics, MLB forecast

FinalMLB.TV, FanDuel SN West, NBC Sports CA

Away

Angels

59-64

2–7

at

Home

Athletics

56-69

LAA 47%ATH 53%

You didn't pick this one.

Sutter Health Park · MLB.TV, FanDuel SN West, NBC Sports CA

Win probability

Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors ATH.

ATH75%50%75%LAAStart1234567Final

Game center

From the ESPN box score.

Top performers

Angels
  • Zach NetoBatting2-5, 1 RBI
  • Tyler AndersonPitching4.0 IP, 4 ER, 1 K
Athletics
  • Brent RookerBatting2-4, 1 HR, 2 RBI
  • Luis MoralesPitching5.0 IP, 1 ER, 5 K

Scoring summary

  • 9Schanuel reached on infield single to shortstop, Teodosio scored on throwing error by shortstop Hernaiz, Neto safe at third on error.2–7
  • 8Rooker singled to center, B. Harris scored, Schuemann to third.1–7
  • 8B. Harris singled to center, Hernaiz scored.1–6
  • 5Rooker homered to left center (421 feet).1–5
  • 3Hernaiz singled to center, Kurtz scored and Rooker scored, Soderstrom to third.1–4
  • 2Neto singled to left, Rengifo scored, Neto out stretching at second.1–2
  • 1Thomas homered to left (413 feet), Langeliers scored.0–2

The pick

Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.

Athletics 53%

Toss-upHit
LAA 47%ATH 53%

Forecast Elo ratings alone

How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 50–55% have won 52.7% of 2,871 graded games.

Market
ATH 53%
ML LAA +105 / ATH -125
Pre-line forecast
ATH 54%
Elo + market-implied
Elo ratings
ATH 55%
Ratings vs. market
+1.7 pts
ATH: Elo 55.0%, market 53.2%
Fair odds
ATH -114
LAA +114 · the forecast as odds, no margin
Pregame projection
LAA 5.1 – 5.4 ATH
Margin from the forecast, posted total 10.5

How the number is built

Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.

FactorLAAATHWhy
Team rating14601467Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average
Home field—+18Worth 18 Elo in MLB
Starting pitchers−2+8LAA: Tyler Anderson: team allows 0.09 more runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts) · ATH: Luis Morales: team allows 0.42 fewer runs than with its usual starter (≈1 weighted starts)
Elo ratingsATH +35 EloATH 55.0%
Market-implied ratingsATH 53.7%Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context
Pre-line forecastATH 53.9%15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend)
ForecastATH 53.2%Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate

Tale of the tape

This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest.

Try another venue →
Los Angeles Angels and Athletics compared, with each team's league rank
LAAStatATH
15th of 304.4Runs scored4.513th of 30
27th of 305.0Runs allowed5.228th of 30
24th of 30−0.6Margin−0.828th of 30
14th of 305–5Last 106–47th of 30
20th of 3026–33Road vs home25–3628th of 30
7th of 301504Opponent Elo150112th of 30
27th of 301460Elo rating146725th of 30

Rating history

Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.

AngelsAthletics
1400145015001550league averageAprJulOctJanAprJul

Against the line

How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.

This seasonLAAATH
Run line65–5766–58
Last 107–37–3
Favorite11–2414–18
Underdog54–3352–40
Overs–unders70–5266–58
Overs–unders, last 108–25–5

Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.

Head to head

LAA 19–15 ATH in their last 34 meetings; the forecast called 18 of 34.