Skip to content
ShadowCryptsPredictions
Live
MLB games
Updated

Atlanta Braves at Chicago Cubs, MLB forecast

FinalMLB.TV, MLB Net, Marquee Sports Net, BravesVision

Away

Braves

88-63

3–7

at

Home

Cubs

84-67

ATL 45%CHC 55%

You didn't pick this one.

Wrigley Field · MLB.TV, MLB Net, Marquee Sports Net, BravesVision

Win probability

Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors CHC.

CHC75%50%75%ATLStart1234567Final

Game center

From the ESPN box score.

Top performers

Braves
  • Mike YastrzemskiBatting1-1, 1 HR, 2 RBI
  • AJ Smith-ShawverPitching5.0 IP, 2 ER, 2 K
Cubs
  • Pete Crow-ArmstrongBatting4-5, 1 HR, 4 RBI
  • David PetersonPitching6.0 IP, 1 ER, 7 K

Scoring summary

  • 7Yastrzemski homered to center (407 feet), S. Murphy scored.3–7
  • 7S. Murphy grounded into fielder's choice to third, Harris II scored, Dubón out at second.1–7
  • 6Crow-Armstrong homered to right center (373 feet), Kelly scored.0–7
  • 3Conforto doubled to right, Hoerner scored.0–5
  • 3Hoerner singled to right, Busch scored.0–4
  • 2Crow-Armstrong doubled to right, Hoerner scored and Kelly scored.0–3
  • 2Kelly grounded into fielder's choice to shortstop, Happ scored, Ramirez out at second, Hoerner to third.0–1

The pick

Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.

Cubs 55%

LeanHit
ATL 45%CHC 55%

Forecast Elo ratings alone

How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 55–60% have won 55.5% of 2,596 graded games.

Market
CHC 55%
ML ATL +113 / CHC -136
Pre-line forecast
CHC 52%
Elo + market-implied
Elo ratings
CHC 53%
Ratings vs. market
−2.0 pts
CHC: Elo 53.1%, market 55.1%
Fair odds
CHC -123
ATL +123 · the forecast as odds, no margin
Pregame projection
ATL 4.5 – 5.0 CHC
Margin from the forecast, posted total 9.5

How the number is built

Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.

FactorATLCHCWhy
Team rating15301543Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average
Home field—+18Worth 18 Elo in MLB
Starting pitchers−6−16ATL: Reynaldo Lopez: team allows 0.31 more runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts) · CHC: David Peterson: team allows 0.82 more runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts)
Elo ratingsCHC +21 EloCHC 53.1%
Market-implied ratingsCHC 52.3%Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context
Pre-line forecastCHC 52.4%15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend)
ForecastCHC 55.1%Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate

Tale of the tape

This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest.

Try another venue →
Atlanta Braves and Chicago Cubs compared, with each team's league rank
ATLStatCHC
8th of 304.6Runs scored5.31st of 30
4th of 303.8Runs allowed4.413th of 30
5th of 30+0.8Margin+0.93rd of 30
12th of 305–5Last 105–512th of 30
9th of 3036–35Road vs home43–328th of 30
9th of 301501Opponent Elo150112th of 30
8th of 301530Elo rating15434th of 30

Rating history

Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.

BravesCubs
1450150015501600league averageAprJulOctJanAprJulOct

Against the line

How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.

This seasonATLCHC
Run line83–6774–76
Last 105–55–5
Favorite49–5439–60
Underdog34–1335–16
Overs–unders68–75–780–61–9
Overs–unders, last 105–4–14–4–2

Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.

Head to head

ATL 12–9 CHC in their last 21 meetings; the forecast called 10 of 21.