New York Mets at Milwaukee Brewers, MLB forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors MIL.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
Mets- Jared YoungBatting2-4, 1 HR, 1 RBI
- Zac ThorntonPitching6.0 IP, 0 ER, 2 K
Brewers- Jackson ChourioBatting1-4
- Brandon SproatPitching4.2 IP, 2 ER, 4 K
Scoring summary
- 8Robert Jr. homered to left center (451 feet).4–0
- 5Benge doubled to right, Bichette and Lindor scored.3–0
- 2Young homered to right center (393 feet).1–0
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Brewers 56%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 55–60% have won 55.5% of 2,596 graded games.
- Market
- MIL 56%
- ML NYM +117 / MIL -141
- Pre-line forecast
- MIL 59%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- MIL 64%
- Ratings vs. market
- +7.7 pts
- MIL: Elo 63.6%, market 55.9%
- Fair odds
- MIL -127
- NYM +127 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- NYM 4.0 – 4.5 MIL
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 8.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | NYM | MIL | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1479 | 1569 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +18 | Worth 18 Elo in MLB |
| Starting pitchers | +7 | −5 | NYM: Zac Thornton: team allows 0.33 fewer runs than with its usual starter (≈3 weighted starts) · MIL: Brandon Sproat: team allows 0.24 more runs than with its usual starter (≈9 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | MIL +97 Elo | MIL 63.6% | |
| Market-implied ratings | MIL 57.6% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | MIL 58.6% | 15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | MIL 55.9% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest.
| NYM | Stat | MIL |
|---|---|---|
| 27th of 304.1 | Runs scored | 5.14th of 30 |
| 21st of 304.7 | Runs allowed | 3.72nd of 30 |
| 26th of 30−0.7 | Margin | +1.42nd of 30 |
| 16th of 304–6 | Last 10 | 6–45th of 30 |
| 25th of 3021–31 | Road vs home | 33–182nd of 30 |
| 22nd of 301499 | Opponent Elo | 149921st of 30 |
| 22nd of 301479 | Elo rating | 15691st of 30 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season |  NYM |  MIL |
|---|---|---|
| Run line | 45–56 | 55–45 |
| Last 10 | 4–6 | 6–4 |
| Favorite | 24–36 | 34–37 |
| Underdog | 21–20 | 21–8 |
| Overs–unders | 46–46–9 | 45–52–3 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 4–6 | 6–4 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
NYM 6–17 MIL in their last 23 meetings; the forecast called 12 of 23.