Minnesota Twins at New York Mets, MLB forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors NYM.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
- Byron BuxtonBatting1-5, 1 HR, 1 RBI
- Connor PrielippPitching4.0 IP, 2 ER, 6 K
- Francisco LindorBatting2-2, 1 RBI
- Clay HolmesPitching7.0 IP, 2 ER, 3 K
Scoring summary
- 8
Vientos singled to right, Baty scored, Alvarez to third.2–3 - 6
Buxton homered to left (409 feet).2–2 - 4
Alvarez doubled to center, Lindor scored.1–2 - 4
Caratini hit sacrifice fly to center, Larnach scored.1–1 - 1
Lindor reached on infield single to third, Bichette scored.0–1
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Mets 59%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 55–60% have won 55.5% of 2,596 graded games.
- Market
- NYM 59%
- ML MIN +135 / NYM -163
- Pre-line forecast
- NYM 56%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- NYM 53%
- Ratings vs. market
- −6.1 pts
- NYM: Elo 53.2%, market 59.3%
- Fair odds
- NYM -146
- MIN +146 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- MIN 3.3 – 4.2 NYM
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 7.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | MIN | NYM | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1482 | 1492 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +18 | Worth 18 Elo in MLB |
| Starting pitchers | +5 | −1 | MIN: Connor Prielipp (no track record yet) · NYM: Clay Holmes: team allows 0.04 more runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | NYM +22 Elo | NYM 53.2% | |
| Market-implied ratings | NYM 57.1% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | NYM 56.5% | 15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | NYM 59.3% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest.
| MIN | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 7th of 305.1 | Runs scored | 3.330th of 30 |
| 17th of 304.5 | Runs allowed | 4.415th of 30 |
| 8th of 30+0.6 | Margin | −1.228th of 30 |
| 11th of 305–5 | Last 10 | 0–1030th of 30 |
| 12th of 305–5 | Road vs home | 3–729th of 30 |
| 15th of 301501 | Opponent Elo | 15088th of 30 |
| 25th of 301482 | Elo rating | 149219th of 30 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Run line | 13–10 | 8–15 |
| Last 10 | 5–5 | 2–8 |
| Favorite | 2–5 | 4–10 |
| Underdog | 11–5 | 4–5 |
| Overs–unders | 13–9–1 | 10–11–2 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 8–2 | 4–6 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
MIN 6–4 NYM in their last 10 meetings; the forecast called 7 of 10.



