Skip to content
ShadowCryptsPredictions
Live
MLB games
Updated

St. Louis Cardinals at Chicago Cubs, MLB forecast

FinalMarquee Sports Net, FanDuel SN MW, MLB.TV, MLBN

Away

Cardinals

78-82

1–12

at

Home

Cubs

90-70

STL 38%CHC 62%

You didn't pick this one.

Wrigley Field · Marquee Sports Net, FanDuel SN MW, MLB.TV, MLBN

Win probability

Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors CHC.

CHC75%50%75%STLStart1234567Final

Game center

From the ESPN box score.

Top performers

Cardinals
  • Nolan GormanBatting2-4
  • Miles MikolasPitching5.0 IP, 4 ER, 4 K
Cubs
  • Seiya SuzukiBatting1-4, 1 HR, 4 RBI
  • Colin ReaPitching5.2 IP, 0 ER, 7 K

Scoring summary

  • 8Alcántara singled to right, Ballesteros scored.1–12
  • 7Suzuki homered to left center (392 feet), Hoerner scored, Happ scored and Tucker scored.1–11
  • 7Happ reached on infield single to shortstop, Busch scored, Hoerner to second.1–7
  • 7Busch doubled to right, Shaw scored.1–6
  • 7Shaw tripled to left, Swanson scored.1–5
  • 7Walker singled to left, Gorman scored, Saggese to second.1–4
  • 5Busch homered to center (414 feet).0–4
  • 4Crow-Armstrong homered to right center (396 feet), Tucker scored.0–3
  • 1Hoerner homered to center (412 feet).0–1

The pick

Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.

Cubs 62%

SolidHit
STL 38%CHC 62%

Forecast Elo ratings alone

How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 60–65% have won 61.6% of 1,194 graded games.

Market
CHC 62%
ML STL +155 / CHC -185
Pre-line forecast
CHC 59%
Elo + market-implied
Elo ratings
CHC 57%
Ratings vs. market
−5.0 pts
CHC: Elo 57.4%, market 62.3%
Fair odds
CHC -166
STL +166 · the forecast as odds, no margin
Pregame projection
STL 3.7 – 4.8 CHC
Margin from the forecast, posted total 8.5

How the number is built

Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.

FactorSTLCHCWhy
Team rating14801533Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average
Home field—+18Worth 18 Elo in MLB
Starting pitchers+8−12STL: Miles Mikolas: team allows 0.38 fewer runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts) · CHC: Colin Rea: team allows 0.58 more runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts)
Elo ratingsCHC +52 EloCHC 57.4%
Market-implied ratingsCHC 59.1%Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context
Pre-line forecastCHC 58.8%15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend)
ForecastCHC 62.3%Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate

Tale of the tape

This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest.

Try another venue →
St. Louis Cardinals and Chicago Cubs compared, with each team's league rank
STLStatCHC
18th of 304.3Runs scored4.98th of 30
22nd of 304.6Runs allowed4.18th of 30
21st of 30−0.3Margin+0.85th of 30
7th of 306–4Last 104–618th of 30
22nd of 3034–44Road vs home47–297th of 30
5th of 301504Opponent Elo150018th of 30
23rd of 301480Elo rating15336th of 30

Rating history

Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.

CardinalsCubs
1450150015501600league averageAprJulOctJanAprJul

Against the line

How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.

This seasonSTLCHC
Run line76–8374–85
Last 107–36–4
Favorite24–4847–59
Underdog52–3527–26
Overs–unders83–7679–80
Overs–unders, last 104–66–4

Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.

Head to head

STL 17–19 CHC in their last 36 meetings; the forecast called 18 of 36.