Florida Panthers at Edmonton Oilers, NHL forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with every score and the time left. Above the line favors EDM; hover for each play.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
- Brad MarchandGoals1
- Nate SchmidtAssists2
- Nate SchmidtPoints2
- Leon DraisaitlGoals2
- Kasperi KapanenAssists2
- Leon DraisaitlPoints2
Scoring summary
- OT19:29
Leon Draisaitl Goal (9) Snap Shot, assists: Connor McDavid (22), Corey Perry (4)3–4 - P36:33
Mattias Ekholm Goal (1) Snap Shot, assists: Connor McDavid (21), Kasperi Kapanen (2)3–3 - P23:17
Viktor Arvidsson Goal (2) Slap Shot, assists: Vasily Podkolzin (6), Evan Bouchard (12)3–2 - P22:00
Sam Bennett Goal (12) Snap Shot, assists: Nate Schmidt (6), Carter Verhaeghe (10)3–1 - P112:30
Brad Marchand Goal (5) Wrist Shot, assists: Nate Schmidt (5), Evan Rodrigues (11)2–1 - P110:49
Sam Bennett Goal (11) Deflected, assists: Carter Verhaeghe (9), Matthew Tkachuk (12)1–1 - P11:06
Leon Draisaitl Goal (8) Snap Shot, assists: Kasperi Kapanen (1), Jake Walman (6)0–1
Turning points
The 5 plays that swung the win chance most, each judged at its own moment: the chance with the score just before it against just after.
- P110:49
Sam Bennett Goal (11) Deflected, assists: Carter Verhaeghe (9), Matthew Tkachuk (12)FLA 1 – 1 EDM · FLA 33% → 48% +15FLA 33% → 48%+15 pts - P112:30
Brad Marchand Goal (5) Wrist Shot, assists: Nate Schmidt (5), Evan Rodrigues (11)FLA 2 – 1 EDM · FLA 48% → 64% +16FLA 48% → 64%+16 pts - P23:17
Viktor Arvidsson Goal (2) Slap Shot, assists: Vasily Podkolzin (6), Evan Bouchard (12)FLA 3 – 2 EDM · EDM 19% → 34% +15EDM 19% → 34%+15 pts - P36:33
Mattias Ekholm Goal (1) Snap Shot, assists: Connor McDavid (21), Kasperi Kapanen (2)FLA 3 – 3 EDM · EDM 23% → 51% +28EDM 23% → 51%+28 pts - OT19:29
Leon Draisaitl Goal (9) Snap Shot, assists: Connor McDavid (22), Corey Perry (4)FLA 3 – 4 EDM · EDM 51% → 100% +49EDM 51% → 100%+49 pts
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Oilers 52%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: NHL favorites the forecast gave 50–55% have won 51.2% of 926 graded games.
- Market
- EDM 52%
- ML FLA +100 / EDM -120
- Pre-line forecast
- EDM 47%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- EDM 55%
- Ratings vs. market
- +3.2 pts
- EDM: Elo 55.4%, market 52.2%
- Fair odds
- EDM -109
- FLA +109 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- FLA 3.2 – 3.3 EDM
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 6.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | FLA | EDM | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1579 | 1584 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +35 | Worth 35 Elo in the NHL |
| Starting goalies | +5 | +3 | FLA: Sergei Bobrovsky: team allows 0.12 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈48 weighted starts) · EDM: Stuart Skinner: team allows 0.07 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈47 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | EDM +37 Elo | EDM 55.4% | |
| Market-implied ratings | FLA 54.8% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | FLA 52.8% | 20% Elo, 80% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | EDM 52.2% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Overtime and shootout losses count as losses in these records. Shot share is a team's share of the shots on goal in its games. PDO adds shooting and save percentages: far from 100 tends to even out.
| FLA | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 14th of 323.1 | Goals scored | 3.211th of 32 |
| 6th of 322.7 | Goals allowed | 2.914th of 32 |
| 10th of 32+0.4 | Margin | +0.311th of 32 |
| 2nd of 3254.6% | Shot share | 54.3%3rd of 32 |
| 10th of 3290.5% | Save percentage | 89.7%19th of 32 |
| 25th of 323–7 | Last 10 | 7–33rd of 32 |
| 14th of 3219–21 | Road vs home | 25–1613th of 32 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Puck line | 48–51 | 41–57 |
| Last 10 | 7–3 | 8–2 |
| Favorite | 34–47 | 24–51 |
| Underdog | 14–4 | 17–6 |
| Overs–unders | 49–50 | 45–53 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 6–4 | 5–5 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
FLA 8–3 EDM in their last 11 meetings; the forecast called 7 of 11.
- Feb 27
EDM 3 @ FLA 4Picked FLA 56%Hit - Dec 16
FLA 6 @ EDM 5Picked EDM 54%Miss - Jun 24
EDM 1 @ FLA 2PlayoffsPicked FLA 55%Hit - Jun 21
FLA 1 @ EDM 5PlayoffsPicked EDM 55%Hit - Jun 18
EDM 5 @ FLA 3PlayoffsPicked FLA 55%Miss - Jun 15
FLA 1 @ EDM 8PlayoffsPicked EDM 54%Hit - Jun 13
FLA 4 @ EDM 3PlayoffsPicked EDM 54%Miss - Jun 10
EDM 1 @ FLA 4PlayoffsPicked FLA 56%Hit



