Chicago Cubs at Arizona Diamondbacks, MLB forecast
You didn't pick this one.
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors ARI.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
Cubs- Pete Crow-ArmstrongBatting1-4
- Matthew BoydPitching6.0 IP, 1 ER, 5 K
Diamondbacks- Jordan LawlarBatting2-3, 1 HR, 1 RBI
- Eduardo RodriguezPitching7.0 IP, 0 ER, 9 K
Scoring summary
- 8Waldschmidt sacrificed into double play, right to first, McCann scored, Lawlar thrown out at first.0–2
- 6Lawlar homered to right (364 feet).0–1
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Cubs 52%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 50–55% have won 52.7% of 2,871 graded games.
- Market
- CHC 52%
- ML CHC -110 / ARI +103
- Pre-line forecast
- CHC 50%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- CHC 51%
- Ratings vs. market
- −0.6 pts
- CHC: Elo 51.0%, market 51.5%
- Fair odds
- CHC -106
- ARI +106 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- CHC 4.3 – 4.2 ARI
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 8.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | CHC | ARI | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1548 | 1510 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +18 | Worth 18 Elo in MLB |
| Starting pitchers | 0 | +13 | CHC: Matthew Boyd: team allows 0.01 fewer runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts) · ARI: Eduardo Rodriguez: team allows 0.66 fewer runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | CHC +7 Elo | CHC 51.0% | |
| Market-implied ratings | CHC 50.4% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | CHC 50.4% | 15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | CHC 51.5% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest.
| CHC | Stat | ARI |
|---|---|---|
| 1st of 305.2 | Runs scored | 4.512th of 30 |
| 11th of 304.3 | Runs allowed | 4.518th of 30 |
| 3rd of 30+0.9 | Margin | 0.015th of 30 |
| 19th of 304–6 | Last 10 | 5–511th of 30 |
| 5th of 3038–30 | Road vs home | 38–289th of 30 |
| 26th of 301497 | Opponent Elo | 150012th of 30 |
| 4th of 301548 | Elo rating | 151010th of 30 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season |  CHC |  ARI |
|---|---|---|
| Run line | 67–66 | 72–61 |
| Last 10 | 6–4 | 4–6 |
| Favorite | 35–52 | 22–35 |
| Underdog | 32–14 | 50–26 |
| Overs–unders | 70–56–7 | 56–69–8 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 7–3 | 7–3 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
CHC 12–13 ARI in their last 25 meetings; the forecast called 15 of 25.