Chicago Cubs at Milwaukee Brewers, MLB forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors MIL.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
- Seiya SuzukiBatting1-5, 2 RBI
- Bryse WilsonPitching4.1 IP, 0 ER, 4 K
- Gary SanchezBatting1-4, 1 HR, 1 RBI
- Brandon WoodruffPitching5.2 IP, 0 ER, 6 K
Scoring summary
- 10
Mitchell walked, Yelich scored, Turang to second, Chourio to third.4–3 - 10
Yelich singled to right, Ortiz scored, Yelich to second.4–2 - 10
Suzuki singled to left, Bregman scored and Crow-Armstrong scored, Busch to second.4–1 - 10
Busch walked, Dean scored, Bregman to second, Crow-Armstrong to third. Milwaukee Brewers challenged: call on the field was upheld.2–1 - 7
Happ scored on Ashby wild pitch, Hoerner to second on wild pitch by Ashby.1–1 - 7
Happ scored on Ashby wild pitch, Hoerner to second on wild pitch by Ashby.1–1 - 2
Sánchez homered to left (415 feet).0–1
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Brewers 60%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 60–65% have won 61.6% of 1,194 graded games.
- Market
- MIL 60%
- ML CHC +139 / MIL -169
- Pre-line forecast
- MIL 59%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- MIL 59%
- Ratings vs. market
- −1.3 pts
- MIL: Elo 58.8%, market 60.0%
- Fair odds
- MIL -150
- CHC +150 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- CHC 3.6 – 4.4 MIL
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 8
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | CHC | MIL | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1529 | 1567 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +18 | Worth 18 Elo in MLB |
| Starting pitchers | +2 | +8 | CHC: Ryan Rolison: team allows 0.08 fewer runs than with its usual starter (≈1 weighted starts) · MIL: Brandon Woodruff: team allows 0.40 fewer runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | MIL +62 Elo | MIL 58.8% | |
| Market-implied ratings | MIL 58.7% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | MIL 58.7% | 15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | MIL 60.0% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest.
| CHC | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 6th of 304.9 | Runs scored | 5.23rd of 30 |
| 14th of 304.5 | Runs allowed | 3.72nd of 30 |
| 5th of 30+0.5 | Margin | +1.52nd of 30 |
| 2nd of 307–3 | Last 10 | 6–48th of 30 |
| 10th of 3022–21 | Road vs home | 26–166th of 30 |
| 25th of 301497 | Opponent Elo | 149916th of 30 |
| 6th of 301529 | Elo rating | 15672nd of 30 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Run line | 34–49 | 45–35 |
| Last 10 | 7–3 | 5–5 |
| Favorite | 18–35 | 26–28 |
| Underdog | 16–14 | 19–7 |
| Overs–unders | 43–35–5 | 37–40–3 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 8–2 | 5–4–1 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
CHC 21–28 MIL in their last 49 meetings; the forecast called 23 of 49.
- Jun 27
CHC 8 @ MIL 2Picked MIL 58%Miss - Jun 26
CHC 2 @ MIL 6Picked MIL 69%Hit - May 20
MIL 5 @ CHC 0Picked CHC 53%Miss - May 19
MIL 5 @ CHC 2Picked MIL 53%Hit - May 18
MIL 9 @ CHC 3Picked CHC 59%Miss - Oct 11
CHC 1 @ MIL 3PlayoffsPicked MIL 57%Hit - Oct 9
MIL 0 @ CHC 6PlayoffsPicked MIL 52%Miss - Oct 8
MIL 3 @ CHC 4PlayoffsPicked CHC 50%Hit



