Baltimore Orioles at Milwaukee Brewers, MLB forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors MIL.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
- Jackson HollidayBatting1-4, 1 RBI
- Chayce McDermottPitching4.2 IP, 3 ER, 2 K
- Brice TurangBatting2-5, 1 HR, 1 RBI
- Logan HendersonPitching5.0 IP, 0 ER, 7 K
Scoring summary
- 8
Ortiz reached on infield single to second, Frelick scored on throwing error by second baseman Holliday.2–5 - 8
Hoskins homered to center (392 feet).2–4 - 7
Holliday tripled to left, Urías scored.2–3 - 7
Urías singled to left, Mountcastle scored.1–3 - 4
Frelick homered to right (412 feet), Hoskins scored.0–3 - 3
Turang homered to center (409 feet).0–1
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Brewers 53%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 50–55% have won 52.7% of 2,871 graded games.
- Market
- MIL 53%
- ML BAL +105 / MIL -125
- Pre-line forecast
- MIL 53%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- MIL 60%
- Ratings vs. market
- +7.0 pts
- MIL: Elo 60.2%, market 53.2%
- Fair odds
- MIL -114
- BAL +114 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- BAL 4.1 – 4.4 MIL
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 8.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | BAL | MIL | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1478 | 1518 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +18 | Worth 18 Elo in MLB |
| Starting pitchers | −15 | −1 | BAL: Keegan Akin: team allows 0.74 more runs than with its usual starter (≈1 weighted starts) · MIL: Logan Henderson: team allows 0.03 more runs than with its usual starter (≈2 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | MIL +72 Elo | MIL 60.2% | |
| Market-implied ratings | MIL 51.7% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | MIL 53.0% | 15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | MIL 53.2% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest.
| BAL | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 25th of 303.8 | Runs scored | 4.215th of 30 |
| 28th of 305.6 | Runs allowed | 4.418th of 30 |
| 29th of 30−1.9 | Margin | −0.119th of 30 |
| 28th of 302–8 | Last 10 | 4–619th of 30 |
| 26th of 307–16 | Road vs home | 14–916th of 30 |
| 13th of 301501 | Opponent Elo | 149918th of 30 |
| 23rd of 301478 | Elo rating | 151813th of 30 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Run line | 16–30 | 23–25 |
| Last 10 | 3–7 | 4–6 |
| Favorite | 7–19 | 13–12 |
| Underdog | 9–11 | 10–13 |
| Overs–unders | 24–22 | 18–30 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 6–4 | 2–8 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
BAL 2–5 MIL in their last 7 meetings; the forecast called 5 of 7.



