Skip to content
ShadowCryptsPredictions
Live
MLB games
Updated

Chicago Cubs at Washington Nationals, MLB forecast

FinalMASN, Marquee Sports Net, MLB.TV

Away

Cubs

71-66

14–1

at

Home

Nationals

61-76

CHC 55%WSH 45%

You didn't pick this one.

Nationals Park · MASN, Marquee Sports Net, MLB.TV

Win probability

Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors WSH.

WSH75%50%75%CHCStart12345678Final

Game center

From the ESPN box score.

Top performers

Cubs
  • Dansby SwansonBatting4-6, 1 RBI
  • Jordan WicksPitching5.0 IP, 1 ER, 0 K
Nationals
  • Darren BakerBatting1-1
  • Mitchell ParkerPitching6.0 IP, 3 ER, 8 K

Scoring summary

  • 9Swanson reached on infield single to second, Amaya scored, Tauchman to second.14–1
  • 9Pitch 5 : Ball In Play14–1
  • 9Pitch 4 : Ball 214–1
  • 9Pitch 3 : Ball 114–1
  • 9Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Swinging14–1
  • 9Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking14–1
  • 9Tauchman singled to center, Crow-Armstrong scored, Amaya to third.13–1
  • 9Pitch 3 : Ball In Play13–1
  • 9Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul13–1
  • 9Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging13–1
  • 9Amaya doubled to left, Busch scored and Hoerner scored, Crow-Armstrong to third.12–1
  • 9Pitch 5 : Ball In Play12–1
  • 9Pitch 4 : Ball 212–1
  • 9Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Looking12–1
  • 9Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul12–1
  • 9Pitch 1 : Ball 112–1
  • 9Hoerner singled to left, Paredes scored and Suzuki scored, Busch to second.10–1
  • 9Pitch 2 : Ball In Play10–1
  • 9Pitch 1 : Ball 110–1
  • 9Busch walked, Happ scored, Paredes to second, Suzuki to third.8–1
  • 9Pitch 6 : Ball 48–1
  • 9Pitch 5 : Ball 38–1
  • 9Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Swinging8–1
  • 9Pitch 3 : Ball 28–1
  • 9Pitch 2 : Ball 18–1
  • 9Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking8–1
  • 7Paredes singled to center, Bellinger scored.7–1
  • 7Pitch 6 : Ball In Play7–1
  • 7Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul7–1
  • 7Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul7–1
  • 7Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Looking7–1
  • 7Pitch 2 : Ball 27–1
  • 7Pitch 1 : Ball 17–1
  • 7Bellinger grounded into fielder's choice to second, Swanson scored and Suzuki scored on fielding error by second baseman L. García Jr.6–1
  • 7Pitch 3 : Ball In Play6–1
  • 7Pitch 2 : Ball 16–1
  • 7Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul6–1
  • 4Crow-Armstrong reached on bunt single to third, Hoerner scored on throwing error by third baseman Tena, Crow-Armstrong to third.4–1
  • 4Pitch 1 : Ball In Play4–1
  • 3Paredes singled to right, Happ scored and Swanson scored, Suzuki to third.3–1

The pick

Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.

Cubs 55%

LeanHit
CHC 55%WSH 45%

Forecast Elo ratings alone

How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 55–60% have won 55.5% of 2,596 graded games.

Market
CHC 55%
ML CHC -135 / WSH +115
Pre-line forecast
CHC 53%
Elo + market-implied
Elo ratings
CHC 56%
Ratings vs. market
+0.8 pts
CHC: Elo 56.1%, market 55.3%
Fair odds
CHC -124
WSH +124 · the forecast as odds, no margin
Pregame projection
CHC 4.5 – 4.0 WSH
Margin from the forecast, posted total 8.5

How the number is built

Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.

FactorCHCWSHWhy
Team rating15241469Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average
Home field—+18Worth 18 Elo in MLB
Starting pitchers+3−3CHC: Jordan Wicks: team allows 0.13 fewer runs than with its usual starter (≈7 weighted starts) · WSH: Mitchell Parker: team allows 0.15 more runs than with its usual starter (≈9 weighted starts)
Elo ratingsCHC +42 EloCHC 56.1%
Market-implied ratingsCHC 52.8%Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context
Pre-line forecastCHC 53.3%15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend)
ForecastCHC 55.3%Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate

Tale of the tape

This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road.

Try another venue →
Chicago Cubs and Washington Nationals compared, with each team's league rank
CHCStatWSH
14th of 304.5Runs scored4.221st of 30
11th of 304.2Runs allowed4.724th of 30
13th of 30+0.3Margin−0.524th of 30
1st of 308–2Last 105–514th of 30
18th of 3034–37Road vs home32–3624th of 30

Rating history

Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.

CubsNationals
14001450150015501600league averageAprJulOctJanAprJul

Against the line

How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.

This seasonCHCWSH
Run line67–6875–61
Last 107–37–3
Favorite20–4511–17
Underdog47–2364–44
Overs–unders63–71–165–70–1
Overs–unders, last 108–22–8

Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.

Head to head

CHC 5–4 WSH in their last 9 meetings; the forecast called 7 of 9.