Skip to content
ShadowCryptsPredictions
Live
MLB games
Updated

San Francisco Giants at Chicago Cubs, MLB forecast

Final

Away

Giants

36-38

2–5

at

Home

Cubs

35-39

SF 49%CHC 51%

You didn't pick this one.

Wrigley Field

Win probability

Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors CHC.

CHC75%50%75%SFStart1234567Final

Game center

From the ESPN box score.

Top performers

Giants
  • Curt CasaliBatting2-3, 2 RBI
  • Logan WebbPitching7.0 IP, 2 ER, 5 K
Cubs
  • Dansby SwansonBatting1-4, 1 HR, 2 RBI
  • Justin SteelePitching6.2 IP, 2 ER, 8 K

Scoring summary

  • 8Morel reached on infield single to shortstop, Happ scored, Bote to second, Swanson to third.2–5
  • 8Pitch 2 : Ball In Play2–5
  • 8Pitch 1 : Ball 12–5
  • 8Happ singled to right, Bellinger scored, Suzuki to third.2–4
  • 8Pitch 5 : Ball In Play2–4
  • 8Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Swinging2–3
  • 8Pitch 3 : Ball 22–3
  • 8Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul2–3
  • 8Pitch 1 : Ball 12–3
  • 8Bellinger singled to left, Busch scored, Bellinger to second.2–3
  • 8Pitch 2 : Ball In Play2–3
  • 8Pitch 1 : Ball 12–2
  • 5Casali doubled to center, Yastrzemski scored and Soler scored.2–2
  • 5Pitch 2 : Ball In Play2–2
  • 5Pitch 1 : Ball 10–2
  • 2Swanson homered to right center (401 feet), Happ scored.0–2
  • 2Pitch 4 : Ball In Play0–2
  • 2Pitch 3 : Ball 20–0
  • 2Pitch 2 : Ball 10–0
  • 2Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking0–0

The pick

Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.

Cubs 51%

Toss-upHit
SF 49%CHC 51%

Forecast Elo ratings alone

How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 50–55% have won 52.7% of 2,871 graded games.

Market
CHC 51%
ML SF -105 / CHC -115
Pre-line forecast
CHC 49%
Elo + market-implied
Elo ratings
CHC 51%
Ratings vs. market
+0.4 pts
CHC: Elo 51.5%, market 51.1%
Fair odds
CHC -104
SF +104 · the forecast as odds, no margin
Pregame projection
SF 4.7 – 4.8 CHC
Margin from the forecast, posted total 9.5

How the number is built

Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.

FactorSFCHCWhy
Team rating14881500Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average
Home field—+18Worth 18 Elo in MLB
Starting pitchers+8−11SF: Logan Webb: team allows 0.41 fewer runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts) · CHC: Justin Steele: team allows 0.56 more runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts)
Elo ratingsCHC +10 EloCHC 51.5%
Market-implied ratingsSF 51.1%Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context
Pre-line forecastSF 50.7%15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend)
ForecastCHC 51.1%Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate

Tale of the tape

This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road.

Try another venue →
San Francisco Giants and Chicago Cubs compared, with each team's league rank
SFStatCHC
13th of 304.4Runs scored4.220th of 30
23rd of 304.7Runs allowed4.417th of 30
21st of 30−0.3Margin−0.220th of 30
7th of 306–4Last 103–724th of 30
24th of 3016–20Road vs home19–1611th of 30

Rating history

Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.

GiantsCubs
1450150015501600league averageAprJulOctJanAprJul

Against the line

How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.

This seasonSFCHC
Run line38–3436–37
Last 106–46–4
Favorite15–199–23
Underdog23–1527–14
Overs–unders39–32–132–40–1
Overs–unders, last 105–51–9

Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.

Head to head

SF 2–5 CHC in their last 7 meetings; the forecast called 4 of 7.