Toronto Maple Leafs at Ottawa Senators, NHL forecast
You didn't pick this one.
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with every score and the time left. Above the line favors OTT; hover for each play.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
- Oliver Ekman-LarssonGoals1
- Chris TanevAssists1
- John TavaresPoints1
- David PerronGoals1
- Adam GaudetteAssists1
- David PerronPoints1
Scoring summary
- OT17:42
Jake Sanderson Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: none3–4 - P314:31
Oliver Ekman-Larsson Goal (2) Snap Shot, assists: William Nylander (5), Jake McCabe (1)3–3 - P37:32
David Perron Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: Artem Zub (1), Adam Gaudette (1)2–3 - P210:12
Matthew Knies Goal (3) Wrist Shot, assists: Mitch Marner (6), Auston Matthews (5)2–2 - P119:05
John Tavares Goal (3) Tip-In, assists: William Nylander (4), Chris Tanev (1)1–2 - P114:11
Shane Pinto Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: none0–2 - P19:03
Tim Stützle Goal (1) Slap Shot, assists: Jake Sanderson (2), Brady Tkachuk (1)0–1
Turning points
The 5 plays that swung the win chance most, each judged at its own moment: the chance with the score just before it against just after.
- P19:03
Tim Stützle Goal (1) Slap Shot, assists: Jake Sanderson (2), Brady Tkachuk (1)TOR 0 – 1 OTT · OTT 52% → 67% +15OTT 52% → 67%+15 pts - P210:12
Matthew Knies Goal (3) Wrist Shot, assists: Mitch Marner (6), Auston Matthews (5)TOR 2 – 2 OTT · TOR 29% → 48% +20TOR 29% → 48%+20 pts - P37:32
David Perron Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: Artem Zub (1), Adam Gaudette (1)TOR 2 – 3 OTT · OTT 51% → 80% +29OTT 51% → 80%+29 pts - P314:31
Oliver Ekman-Larsson Goal (2) Snap Shot, assists: William Nylander (5), Jake McCabe (1)TOR 3 – 3 OTT · TOR 11% → 49% +38TOR 11% → 49%+38 pts - OT17:42
Jake Sanderson Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: noneTOR 3 – 4 OTT · OTT 51% → 100% +49OTT 51% → 100%+49 pts
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Senators 52%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: NHL favorites the forecast gave 50–55% have won 51.2% of 926 graded games.
- Market
- OTT 52%
- ML TOR +100 / OTT -120
- Pre-line forecast
- OTT 51%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- OTT 45%
- Ratings vs. market
- −7.5 pts
- OTT: Elo 44.6%, market 52.2%
- Fair odds
- OTT -109
- TOR +109 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- TOR 2.7 – 2.8 OTT
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 5.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | TOR | OTT | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1563 | 1503 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +35 | Worth 35 Elo in the NHL |
| Starting goalies | +13 | 0 | TOR: Anthony Stolarz: team allows 0.32 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈35 weighted starts) · OTT: Linus Ullmark: team allows 0.00 more goals than with its usual starter (≈41 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | TOR +37 Elo | TOR 55.4% | |
| Market-implied ratings | OTT 52.8% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | OTT 51.2% | 20% Elo, 80% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | OTT 52.2% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Overtime and shootout losses count as losses in these records. Shot share is a team's share of the shots on goal in its games. PDO adds shooting and save percentages: far from 100 tends to even out.
| TOR | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 9th of 323.3 | Goals scored | 3.018th of 32 |
| 8th of 322.8 | Goals allowed | 2.912th of 32 |
| 8th of 32+0.5 | Margin | +0.114th of 32 |
| 23rd of 3248.9% | Shot share | 50.6%12th of 32 |
| 3rd of 3291.2% | Save percentage | 90.7%7th of 32 |
| 1st of 329–1 | Last 10 | 6–49th of 32 |
| 2nd of 3225–16 | Road vs home | 27–147th of 32 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Puck line | 42–43 | 36–49 |
| Last 10 | 6–4 | 5–5 |
| Favorite | 25–36 | 14–36 |
| Underdog | 17–7 | 22–13 |
| Overs–unders | 42–43 | 40–45 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 3–7 | 6–4 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
TOR 4–6 OTT in their last 10 meetings; the forecast called 4 of 10.
- Apr 24
TOR 3 @ OTT 2PlayoffsPicked OTT 54%Miss - Apr 22
OTT 2 @ TOR 3PlayoffsPicked TOR 59%Hit - Apr 20
OTT 2 @ TOR 6PlayoffsPicked TOR 61%Hit - Mar 15
OTT 4 @ TOR 2Picked TOR 55%Miss - Jan 25
TOR 1 @ OTT 2Picked OTT 50%Hit - Nov 12
OTT 3 @ TOR 0Picked TOR 53%Miss - Feb 10
TOR 3 @ OTT 5Picked OTT 54%Hit - Dec 27
OTT 4 @ TOR 2Picked TOR 56%Miss



