Skip to content
ShadowCryptsPredictions
Live
NHL games
Updated

Nashville Predators at Chicago Blackhawks, NHL forecast

FinalNHLPP|ESPN+

Away

Predators

46-29-5

5–1

at

Home

Blackhawks

23-51-5

NSH 49%CHI 51%

You didn't pick this one.

United Center · NHLPP|ESPN+

Win probability

Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with every score and the time left. Above the line favors CHI; hover for each play.

CHI favored NSH favored6 scoring plays
P1P2P3CHI50%NSH

Game center

From the ESPN box score.

Top performers

Predators
Blackhawks

Scoring summary

  • P31:37Filip Forsberg Goal (46) Snap Shot, assists: Ryan O'Reilly (41), Luke Evangelista (21)5–1
  • P216:58Philipp Kurashev Goal (18) Slap Shot, assists: Connor Bedard (38), Tyler Johnson (14)4–1
  • P29:39Jason Zucker Goal (14) Backhand, assists: Roman Josi (60), Kevin Lankinen (1)4–0
  • P25:22Filip Forsberg Goal (45) Wrist Shot, assists: none3–0
  • P119:03Kiefer Sherwood Goal (10) Wrist Shot, assists: Luke Schenn (6), Spencer Stastney (2)2–0
  • P15:53Filip Forsberg Goal (44) Snap Shot, assists: Luke Evangelista (20), Tommy Novak (26)1–0

Turning points

The 5 plays that swung the win chance most, each judged at its own moment: the chance with the score just before it against just after.

  1. P15:53Filip Forsberg Goal (44) Snap Shot, assists: Luke Evangelista (20), Tommy Novak (26)NSH 1 – 0 CHI · NSH 49% → 64% +15
  2. P119:03Kiefer Sherwood Goal (10) Wrist Shot, assists: Luke Schenn (6), Spencer Stastney (2)NSH 2 – 0 CHI · NSH 66% → 81% +14
  3. P25:22Filip Forsberg Goal (45) Wrist Shot, assists: noneNSH 3 – 0 CHI · NSH 83% → 92% +10
  4. P29:39Jason Zucker Goal (14) Backhand, assists: Roman Josi (60), Kevin Lankinen (1)NSH 4 – 0 CHI · NSH 94% → 98% +4
  5. P216:58Philipp Kurashev Goal (18) Slap Shot, assists: Connor Bedard (38), Tyler Johnson (14)NSH 4 – 1 CHI · CHI <1% → 4% +3

The pick

Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point.

Blackhawks 51%

Toss-upMiss
NSH 49%CHI 51%

Forecast Elo ratings alone

How often that comes true: NHL favorites the forecast gave 50–55% have won 51.2% of 926 graded games.

Market
No line yet
Pre-line forecast
CHI 51%
Elo + market-implied
Elo ratings
CHI 36%
Fair odds
CHI -104
NSH +104 · the forecast as odds, no margin
Pregame projection
NSH 3.0 – 3.1 CHI
Margin from the forecast, total from team scoring ratings

How the number is built

Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.

FactorNSHCHIWhy
Team rating15301402Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average
Home field—+35Worth 35 Elo in the NHL
Starting goalies−6−16NSH: Kevin Lankinen: team allows 0.15 more goals than with its usual starter (≈14 weighted starts) · CHI: Arvid Soderblom: team allows 0.39 more goals than with its usual starter (≈19 weighted starts)
Elo ratingsNSH +103 EloNSH 64.4%
Market-implied ratingsCHI 55.0%Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context
Pre-line forecastCHI 51.1%20% Elo, 80% market-implied (log-odds blend)

Tale of the tape

This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Overtime and shootout losses count as losses in these records. Shot share is a team's share of the shots on goal in its games. PDO adds shooting and save percentages: far from 100 tends to even out.

Try another venue →
Nashville Predators and Chicago Blackhawks compared, with each team's league rank
NSHStatCHI
14th of 313.2Goals scored2.131st of 31
10th of 312.9Goals allowed3.526th of 31
13th of 31+0.3Margin−1.330th of 31
13th of 3151.1%Shot share44.8%30th of 31
7th of 3191.1%Save percentage89.9%23rd of 31
6th of 316–4Last 104–621st of 31
3rd of 3123–14Road vs home15–2327th of 31

Rating history

Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.

PredatorsBlackhawks
13501400145015001550league averageNovFebMayAugNov

Head to head

NSH 3–0 CHI in their last 3 meetings; the forecast called 2 of 3.