Skip to content
ShadowCryptsPredictions
Live
NFL games
Updated

Minnesota Vikings at Los Angeles Chargers, NFL forecast

FinalPrime Video

Away

Vikings

3-4

10–37

at

Home

Chargers

5-3

MIN 40%LAC 60%

You didn't pick this one.

SoFi Stadium · Prime Video

Win probability

Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with every score and the time left. Above the line favors LAC; hover for each play.

LAC favored MIN favored9 scoring plays
Q1Q2Q3Q4LAC50%MIN

Game center

From the ESPN box score.

Top performers

Vikings
Chargers

Scoring summary

  • Q41:56Cameron Dicker 45 Yd Field Goal10–37
  • Q47:01Cameron Dicker 34 Yd Field Goal10–34
  • Q412:42Tre' Harris 6 Yd pass from Justin Herbert (Cameron Dicker Kick)10–31
  • Q34:36Jordan Addison 4 Yd pass from Carson Wentz (Will Reichard Kick)10–24
  • Q310:01Cameron Dicker 43 Yd Field Goal3–24
  • Q20:45Ladd McConkey 27 Yd pass from Justin Herbert (Cameron Dicker Kick)3–21
  • Q28:55Will Reichard 54 Yd Field Goal3–14
  • Q213:08Kimani Vidal 3 Yd Rush (Cameron Dicker Kick)0–14
  • Q14:01Oronde Gadsden II 8 Yd pass from Justin Herbert (Cameron Dicker Kick)0–7

Turning points

The 5 plays that swung the win chance most, each judged at its own moment: the chance with the score just before it against just after.

  1. Q14:01Oronde Gadsden II 8 Yd pass from Justin Herbert (Cameron Dicker Kick)MIN 0 – 7 LAC · LAC 59% → 77% +17
  2. Q213:08Kimani Vidal 3 Yd Rush (Cameron Dicker Kick)MIN 0 – 14 LAC · LAC 77% → 90% +13
  3. Q28:55Will Reichard 54 Yd Field GoalMIN 3 – 14 LAC · MIN 10% → 14% +5
  4. Q20:45Ladd McConkey 27 Yd pass from Justin Herbert (Cameron Dicker Kick)MIN 3 – 21 LAC · LAC 88% → 96% +9
  5. Q34:36Jordan Addison 4 Yd pass from Carson Wentz (Will Reichard Kick)MIN 10 – 24 LAC · MIN <1% → 5% +4

The pick

Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.

Chargers 60%

LeanHit
MIN 40%LAC 60%

Forecast Elo ratings alone

How often that comes true: NFL favorites the forecast gave 60–65% have won 63.9% of 119 graded games.

Market
LAC -3.5
ML MIN +145 / LAC -170
Pre-line forecast
LAC 57%
Elo + market-implied
Elo ratings
LAC -1.5
LAC 55%
Ratings vs. market
−5.3 pts
LAC: Elo 55.3%, market 60.7%
Fair odds
LAC -152
MIN +152 · the forecast as odds, no margin
Pregame projection
MIN 20.5 – 24.0 LAC
Posted spread, posted total 44.5

How the number is built

Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.

FactorMINLACWhy
Team rating15591493Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average
Home field—+36Worth 36 Elo in the NFL
Quarterbacks−62+6MIN: Carson Wentz, usually Sam Darnold · LAC: Justin Herbert (against each team's recent starters, from the box score)
Elo ratingsLAC +37 EloLAC 55.3%
Market-implied ratingsLAC 60.0%Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context
Pre-line forecastLAC 56.5%75% Elo, 25% market-implied (log-odds blend)
ForecastLAC 60.3%93% market, 8% Elo

Tale of the tape

This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest. Yards per play counts passes, sacks and runs, with sack yardage taken off.

Try another venue →
Minnesota Vikings and Los Angeles Chargers compared, with each team's league rank
MINStatLAC
15th of 3224.2Points scored21.620th of 32
10th of 3220.8Points allowed23.318th of 32
11th of 32+3.3Margin−1.723rd of 32
17th of 325.42Yards per play5.728th of 32
9th of 325.22Yards allowed per play5.4118th of 32
1st of 321–0Road vs home1–223rd of 32
16th of 321501Opponent Elo149220th of 32
11th of 321559Elo rating149318th of 32

Rating history

Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.

VikingsChargers
13001400150016001700league averageSepDecMarJunSep

Against the line

How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.

This seasonMINLAC
Against the spread3–33–4
Last 103–33–4
Favorite2–22–4
Underdog1–11–0
Overs–unders5–13–4
Overs–unders, last 105–13–4

Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.

Head to head

MIN 0–1 LAC in their last 1 meeting; the forecast called 0 of 1.