Skip to content
ShadowCryptsPredictions
Live
NBA games
Updated

Orlando Magic at Minnesota Timberwolves, NBA forecast

FinalFanDuel SN North, FanDuel SN FL

Away

Magic

26-23

108–106

at

Home

Timberwolves

34-15

ORL 33%MIN 67%

You didn't pick this one.

Target Center · FanDuel SN North, FanDuel SN FL

Win probability

Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with every score and the time left. Above the line favors MIN; hover for each play.

MIN favored ORL favored116 scoring plays
Q1Q2Q3Q4MIN50%ORL

Game center

From the ESPN box score.

Top performers

Magic
Timberwolves

Last plays

  • Q40.0End of Game108–106
  • Q40.0End of the 4th Quarter108–106
  • Q42.0Anthony Edwards makes 24-foot three point jumper (Karl-Anthony Towns assists)108–106
  • Q44.0Kyle Anderson enters the game for Jaden McDaniels108–103
  • Q44.0Timberwolves Full timeout108–103
  • Q44.0Jonathan Isaac makes free throw 2 of 2108–103
  • Q44.0Magic offensive team rebound107–103
  • Q44.0Jonathan Isaac misses free throw 1 of 2107–103
  • Q44.0Mike Conley personal take foul107–103
  • Q44.0Jonathan Isaac defensive rebound107–103

Turning points

The 5 plays that swung the win chance most, each judged at its own moment: the chance with the score just before it against just after.

  1. Q45:26Paolo Banchero makes layup (Franz Wagner assists)ORL 98 – 93 MIN · ORL 62% → 73% +11
  2. Q45:03Anthony Edwards makes driving layupORL 98 – 95 MIN · MIN 25% → 37% +11
  3. Q44:09Franz Wagner makes driving layupORL 100 – 95 MIN · ORL 66% → 77% +12
  4. Q42:21Jaden McDaniels makes 23-foot three point jumper (Anthony Edwards assists)ORL 102 – 101 MIN · MIN 20% → 45% +25
  5. Q41:16Jonathan Isaac makes tip shotORL 105 – 101 MIN · ORL 72% → 89% +17

The pick

Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point.

Timberwolves 67%

SolidMiss
ORL 33%MIN 67%

Forecast Elo ratings alone

How often that comes true: NBA favorites the forecast gave 65–70% have won 65.2% of 388 graded games.

Market
No line yet
Pre-line forecast
MIN 67%
Elo + market-implied
Elo ratings
MIN -5.5
MIN 70%
Fair odds
MIN -204
ORL +204 · the forecast as odds, no margin
Pregame projection
ORL 103.3 – 108.7 MIN
Margin from the forecast, total from team scoring ratings

How the number is built

Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.

FactorORLMINWhy
Team rating15291594Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average
Home field—+36Worth 36 Elo in the NBA
Lineups−4+44ORL: Weaker than its recent lineups · MIN: Stronger than its recent lineups (from the box score)
Elo ratingsMIN +149 EloMIN 70.3%
Market-implied ratingsMIN 66.8%Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context
Pre-line forecastMIN 67.1%10% Elo, 90% market-implied (log-odds blend)

Tale of the tape

This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Offense and defense are points per 100 possessions, which sets aside how fast a team plays.

Try another venue →
Orlando Magic and Minnesota Timberwolves compared, with each team's league rank
ORLStatMIN
25th of 30111.6Points scored113.122nd of 30
5th of 30110.9Points allowed107.01st of 30
15th of 30+0.7Margin+6.15th of 30
24th of 30110.8Offense rating113.418th of 30
4th of 30110.1Defense rating107.31st of 30
19th of 30100.1Pace99.326th of 30
16th of 304–6Last 107–34th of 30
19th of 3010–16Road vs home18–44th of 30

Who's playing

Who sat out, from the box score, and what each absence cost against the lineups the team had been playing.

All player ratings →

Magic

−4 Elo

Full strength: nobody who matters sat out.

Timberwolves

+44 Elo

Full strength: nobody who matters sat out.

Rating history

Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.

MagicTimberwolves
140014501500155016001650league averageNovJanMarMayJulSepNov

Head to head

ORL 0–1 MIN in their last 1 meeting; the forecast called 1 of 1.