Skip to content
ShadowCryptsPredictions
Live
MLB games
Updated

San Francisco Giants at New York Mets, MLB forecast

FinalESPN Unlmtd, MLB.TV, NBC Sports BA, SNY

Away

Giants

59-84

9–5

at

Home

Mets

64-78

SF 40%NYM 60%

You didn't pick this one.

Citi Field · ESPN Unlmtd, MLB.TV, NBC Sports BA, SNY

Win probability

Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors NYM.

NYM75%50%75%SFStart12345678Final

Game center

From the ESPN box score.

Top performers

Giants
  • Rafael DeversBatting2-4, 2 HR, 3 RBI
  • Anthony MolinaPitching5.0 IP, 0 ER, 6 K
Mets
  • A.J. EwingBatting1-2, 1 HR, 2 RBI
  • Zac ThorntonPitching5.0 IP, 6 ER, 6 K

Scoring summary

  • 9Baty doubled to left, Ewing scored and Young scored. Umpire review: call on the field was upheld.9–5
  • 9McCray homered to center (420 feet).9–3
  • 8Basabe homered to left center (375 feet), Eldridge scored.8–3
  • 7Baty walked, Young scored, Ewing to second, Semien to third.6–3
  • 5Devers homered to left (391 feet), Cox scored.6–2
  • 5Koss homered to left (383 feet).4–2
  • 3Koss homered to left center (368 feet), McCray scored.3–2
  • 2Ewing homered to right center (407 feet), Semien scored.1–2
  • 1Devers homered to right (351 feet).1–0

The pick

Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.

Mets 60%

LeanMiss
SF 40%NYM 60%

Forecast Elo ratings alone

How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 60–65% have won 61.6% of 1,194 graded games.

Market
NYM 60%
ML SF +141 / NYM -171
Pre-line forecast
NYM 58%
Elo + market-implied
Elo ratings
NYM 56%
Ratings vs. market
−4.2 pts
NYM: Elo 56.2%, market 60.3%
Fair odds
NYM -152
SF +152 · the forecast as odds, no margin
Pregame projection
SF 3.5 – 4.5 NYM
Margin from the forecast, posted total 8

How the number is built

Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.

FactorSFNYMWhy
Team rating14701495Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average
Home field—+18Worth 18 Elo in MLB
Starting pitchers−2−1SF: Anthony Molina: team allows 0.09 more runs than with its usual starter (≈2 weighted starts) · NYM: Zac Thornton: team allows 0.05 more runs than with its usual starter (≈7 weighted starts)
Elo ratingsNYM +43 EloNYM 56.2%
Market-implied ratingsNYM 58.5%Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context
Pre-line forecastNYM 58.1%15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend)
ForecastNYM 60.3%Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate

Tale of the tape

This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest.

Try another venue →
San Francisco Giants and New York Mets compared, with each team's league rank
SFStatNYM
24th of 304.2Runs scored4.225th of 30
23rd of 304.7Runs allowed4.518th of 30
25th of 30−0.5Margin−0.323rd of 30
19th of 304–6Last 105–511th of 30
30th of 3025–48Road vs home33–3926th of 30
15th of 301500Opponent Elo15046th of 30
26th of 301470Elo rating149517th of 30

Rating history

Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.

GiantsMets
1450150015501600league averageAprJulOctJanAprJul

Against the line

How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.

This seasonSFNYM
Run line72–7067–74
Last 105–55–5
Favorite20–2829–44
Underdog52–4238–30
Overs–unders65–64–1363–65–13
Overs–unders, last 106–3–15–3–2

Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.

Head to head

SF 10–14 NYM in their last 24 meetings; the forecast called 11 of 24.