Skip to content
ShadowCryptsPredictions
Live
MLB games
Updated

Cincinnati Reds at Chicago Cubs, MLB forecast

FinalNBC

Away

Reds

65-72

7–5

at

Home

Cubs

77-60

CIN 41%CHC 59%

You didn't pick this one.

Wrigley Field · NBC

Win probability

Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors CHC.

CHC75%50%75%CINStart12345678Final

Game center

From the ESPN box score.

Top performers

Reds
  • Tyler StephensonBatting2-5, 1 HR, 2 RBI
  • Chase BurnsPitching5.2 IP, 2 ER, 7 K
Cubs
  • Pete Crow-ArmstrongBatting2-5, 2 HR, 2 RBI
  • Shota ImanagaPitching5.0 IP, 6 ER, 4 K

Scoring summary

  • 9Crow-Armstrong homered to right center (431 feet).7–5
  • 8Hoerner hit sacrifice fly to right, Bregman scored.7–4
  • 7Stewart homered to center (418 feet).7–3
  • 5Stephenson homered to left (394 feet), De La Cruz scored.6–3
  • 5Myers homered to left center (384 feet).4–3
  • 4Ramirez flied out to right, Happ scored on throwing error by right fielder Rodríguez, Hoerner safe at second on error.3–3
  • 4Rodríguez homered to right (387 feet), Suárez scored and McLain scored.3–2
  • 2Conforto singled to right, Happ scored, Ramirez to second.0–2
  • 1Crow-Armstrong homered to right center (417 feet).0–1

The pick

Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.

Cubs 59%

LeanMiss
CIN 41%CHC 59%

Forecast Elo ratings alone

How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 55–60% have won 55.5% of 2,596 graded games.

Market
CHC 59%
ML CIN +140 / CHC -150
Pre-line forecast
CHC 59%
Elo + market-implied
Elo ratings
CHC 63%
Ratings vs. market
+3.6 pts
CHC: Elo 62.7%, market 59.0%
Fair odds
CHC -144
CIN +144 · the forecast as odds, no margin
Pregame projection
CIN 4.3 – 5.2 CHC
Margin from the forecast, posted total 9.5

How the number is built

Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.

FactorCINCHCWhy
Team rating14681547Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average
Home field—+18Worth 18 Elo in MLB
Starting pitchers+14+7CIN: Chase Burns: team allows 0.68 fewer runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts) · CHC: Shota Imanaga: team allows 0.35 fewer runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts)
Elo ratingsCHC +90 EloCHC 62.7%
Market-implied ratingsCHC 58.8%Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context
Pre-line forecastCHC 59.4%15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend)
ForecastCHC 59.0%Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate

Tale of the tape

This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest.

Try another venue →
Cincinnati Reds and Chicago Cubs compared, with each team's league rank
CINStatCHC
23rd of 304.1Runs scored5.31st of 30
26th of 304.9Runs allowed4.313th of 30
28th of 30−0.8Margin+0.93rd of 30
18th of 304–6Last 104–618th of 30
15th of 3032–36Road vs home39–288th of 30
17th of 301500Opponent Elo149727th of 30
27th of 301468Elo rating15474th of 30

Rating history

Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.

RedsCubs
1450150015501600league averageAprJulOctJanAprJul

Against the line

How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.

This seasonCINCHC
Run line66–7068–68
Last 104–66–4
Favorite16–3036–54
Underdog50–4032–14
Overs–unders72–62–272–57–7
Overs–unders, last 107–36–4

Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.

Head to head

CIN 25–23 CHC in their last 48 meetings; the forecast called 27 of 48.