Skip to content
ShadowCryptsPredictions
Live
MLB games
Updated

Kansas City Royals at Cleveland Guardians, MLB forecast

FinalMLB.TV, CLEGuardians.TV, Royals.TV

Away

Royals

62-75

8–3

at

Home

Guardians

68-68

KC 40%CLE 60%

You didn't pick this one.

Progressive Field · MLB.TV, CLEGuardians.TV, Royals.TV

Win probability

Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors CLE.

CLE75%50%75%KCStart12345678Final

Game center

From the ESPN box score.

Top performers

Royals
  • Josh RojasBatting2-2, 1 HR, 4 RBI
  • Daniel Lynch IVPitching3.1 IP, 2 ER, 3 K
Guardians
  • Angel MartinezBatting2-4, 1 HR, 3 RBI
  • Foster GriffinPitching5.0 IP, 2 ER, 4 K

Scoring summary

  • 9Martínez singled to center, Ramírez scored.8–3
  • 8Rojas homered to right (360 feet), Rave scored.8–2
  • 6Rojas singled to left, Loftin scored and Rave scored, Collins to second.6–2
  • 6Rave grounded into fielder's choice to third, Caglianone scored on fielding error by third baseman Ramírez, Loftin to second, Perez to third.4–2
  • 6Perez doubled to center, Witt Jr. scored, Caglianone to third.3–2
  • 5Collins doubled to left, Loftin scored and Tolbert scored.2–2
  • 2Martínez homered to left (381 feet), Adell scored.0–2

The pick

Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.

Guardians 60%

LeanMiss
KC 40%CLE 60%

Forecast Elo ratings alone

How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 60–65% have won 61.6% of 1,194 graded games.

Market
CLE 60%
ML KC +148 / CLE -159
Pre-line forecast
CLE 59%
Elo + market-implied
Elo ratings
CLE 56%
Ratings vs. market
−4.5 pts
CLE: Elo 55.9%, market 60.4%
Fair odds
CLE -152
KC +152 · the forecast as odds, no margin
Pregame projection
KC 3.5 – 4.5 CLE
Margin from the forecast, posted total 8

How the number is built

Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.

FactorKCCLEWhy
Team rating14841502Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average
Home field—+18Worth 18 Elo in MLB
Starting pitchers−7−1KC: Daniel Lynch IV: team allows 0.34 more runs than with its usual starter (≈8 weighted starts) · CLE: Foster Griffin: team allows 0.07 more runs than with its usual starter (≈9 weighted starts)
Elo ratingsCLE +41 EloCLE 55.9%
Market-implied ratingsCLE 59.9%Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context
Pre-line forecastCLE 59.3%15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend)
ForecastCLE 60.4%Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate

Tale of the tape

This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest.

Try another venue →
Kansas City Royals and Cleveland Guardians compared, with each team's league rank
KCStatCLE
21st of 304.3Runs scored4.028th of 30
24th of 304.8Runs allowed4.17th of 30
26th of 30−0.6Margin−0.116th of 30
1st of 309–1Last 108–22nd of 30
27th of 3025–45Road vs home31–3525th of 30
28th of 301496Opponent Elo149725th of 30
22nd of 301484Elo rating150213th of 30

Rating history

Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.

RoyalsGuardians
145015001550league averageAprAugDecAprAug

Against the line

How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.

This seasonKCCLE
Run line73–6366–69
Last 108–26–4
Favorite20–2726–50
Underdog53–3640–19
Overs–unders61–69–662–72–1
Overs–unders, last 103–5–22–7–1

Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.

Head to head

KC 23–24 CLE in their last 47 meetings; the forecast called 26 of 47.