Skip to content
ShadowCryptsPredictions
Live
MLB games
Updated

Philadelphia Phillies at Minnesota Twins, MLB forecast

FinalMLB.TV, Twins.TV, NBC Sports Phil

Away

Phillies

66-58

9–1

at

Home

Twins

60-64

PHI 56%MIN 44%

You didn't pick this one.

Target Field · MLB.TV, Twins.TV, NBC Sports Phil

Win probability

Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors MIN.

MIN75%50%75%PHIStart12345678Final

Game center

From the ESPN box score.

Top performers

Phillies
  • Bryson StottBatting1-3, 1 HR, 3 RBI
  • Jesus LuzardoPitching6.2 IP, 1 ER, 9 K
Twins
  • Royce LewisBatting1-4, 1 RBI
  • Connor PrielippPitching5.0 IP, 8 ER, 6 K

Scoring summary

  • 9Realmuto hit sacrifice fly to left, Bohm scored.9–1
  • 6Lewis doubled to left, Jeffers scored. Umpire review: call on the field was upheld.8–1
  • 5Stott homered to right (350 feet), Bohm scored and Sosa scored.8–0
  • 5Sosa singled to left, Arraez scored and Harper scored, Bohm to second.5–0
  • 5Bohm singled to center, Turner scored, Arraez to second, Harper to third.3–0
  • 5Arraez walked, Realmuto scored, Harper to second, Turner to third.2–0
  • 2Realmuto hit sacrifice fly to center, Arraez scored, Bohm to third.1–0

The pick

Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.

Phillies 56%

LeanHit
PHI 56%MIN 44%

Forecast Elo ratings alone

How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 55–60% have won 55.5% of 2,596 graded games.

Market
PHI 56%
ML PHI -133 / MIN +123
Pre-line forecast
PHI 60%
Elo + market-implied
Elo ratings
PHI 56%
Ratings vs. market
+0.4 pts
PHI: Elo 56.4%, market 56.0%
Fair odds
PHI -127
MIN +127 · the forecast as odds, no margin
Pregame projection
PHI 4.3 – 3.7 MIN
Margin from the forecast, posted total 8

How the number is built

Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.

FactorPHIMINWhy
Team rating15221479Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average
Home field—+18Worth 18 Elo in MLB
Starting pitchers+10−10PHI: Jesus Luzardo: team allows 0.50 fewer runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts) · MIN: Connor Prielipp: team allows 0.51 more runs than with its usual starter (≈8 weighted starts)
Elo ratingsPHI +45 EloPHI 56.4%
Market-implied ratingsPHI 61.1%Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context
Pre-line forecastPHI 60.4%15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend)
ForecastPHI 56.0%Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate

Tale of the tape

This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest.

Try another venue →
Philadelphia Phillies and Minnesota Twins compared, with each team's league rank
PHIStatMIN
17th of 304.4Runs scored4.79th of 30
16th of 304.4Runs allowed5.026th of 30
16th of 300.0Margin−0.321st of 30
8th of 305–5Last 104–622nd of 30
8th of 3032–28Road vs home32–2812th of 30
14th of 301500Opponent Elo149917th of 30
9th of 301522Elo rating147923rd of 30

Rating history

Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.

PhilliesTwins
14001450150015501600league averageAprJulOctJanAprJulOct

Against the line

How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.

This seasonPHIMIN
Run line52–7164–59
Last 103–77–3
Favorite37–5316–31
Underdog15–1848–28
Overs–unders53–62–863–50–10
Overs–unders, last 106–3–14–5–1

Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.

Head to head

PHI 5–5 MIN in their last 10 meetings; the forecast called 4 of 10.