Philadelphia Phillies at Toronto Blue Jays, MLB forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors TOR.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
- Nick CastellanosBatting3-3
- Jesus LuzardoPitching2.1 IP, 8 ER, 2 K
- Bo BichetteBatting2-4, 1 HR, 2 RBI
- Chris BassittPitching7.0 IP, 1 ER, 6 K
Scoring summary
- 6
Kirk singled to right, Springer scored.1–9 - 6
Schwarber singled to right, Turner scored.1–8 - 3
Heineman singled to left, Schneider scored and Straw scored, Clase to second.0–8 - 3
Straw singled to right, Clement scored and Kirk scored, Schneider to third.0–6 - 2
Bichette homered to center (413 feet), Heineman scored.0–4 - 2
Heineman doubled to left, Straw scored.0–2 - 2
Straw doubled to center, Schneider scored.0–1
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Phillies 51%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 50–55% have won 52.7% of 2,871 graded games.
- Market
- PHI 51%
- ML PHI -115 / TOR -105
- Pre-line forecast
- PHI 51%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- PHI 51%
- Ratings vs. market
- +0.1 pts
- PHI: Elo 51.2%, market 51.1%
- Fair odds
- PHI -104
- TOR +104 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- PHI 4.3 – 4.2 TOR
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 8.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | PHI | TOR | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1533 | 1496 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +18 | Worth 18 Elo in MLB |
| Starting pitchers | −17 | −7 | PHI: Jesus Luzardo: team allows 0.86 more runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts) · TOR: Chris Bassitt: team allows 0.33 more runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | PHI +8 Elo | PHI 51.2% | |
| Market-implied ratings | PHI 51.1% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | PHI 51.1% | 15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | PHI 51.1% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest.
| PHI | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 6th of 304.8 | Runs scored | 4.118th of 30 |
| 19th of 304.3 | Runs allowed | 4.318th of 30 |
| 10th of 30+0.4 | Margin | −0.121st of 30 |
| 18th of 304–6 | Last 10 | 7–34th of 30 |
| 1st of 3018–12 | Road vs home | 21–1312th of 30 |
| 29th of 301492 | Opponent Elo | 15037th of 30 |
| 6th of 301533 | Elo rating | 149619th of 30 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Run line | 30–31 | 35–26 |
| Last 10 | 4–6 | 5–5 |
| Favorite | 23–26 | 16–13 |
| Underdog | 7–5 | 19–13 |
| Overs–unders | 27–34 | 31–30 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 5–5 | 6–4 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
PHI 7–3 TOR in their last 10 meetings; the forecast called 7 of 10.



