Toronto Blue Jays at Texas Rangers, MLB forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors TEX.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
- Bo BichetteBatting1-4
- Bowden FrancisPitching5.0 IP, 0 ER, 6 K
- Josh JungBatting1-4, 1 RBI
- Jacob LatzPitching3.0 IP, 0 ER, 4 K
Scoring summary
- 8
Jung stole second, Langford scored on pickoff error by catcher Kirk, Jung to third on error.0–2 - 8
Langford scored on pickoff error by catcher Kirk, Jung stole third.0–2 - 8
Langford scored on pickoff error by catcher Kirk, Jung stole third.0–2 - 8
Jung singled to center, Haggerty scored, Langford to third.0–1
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Rangers 57%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 55–60% have won 55.5% of 2,596 graded games.
- Market
- TEX 57%
- ML TOR +125 / TEX -150
- Pre-line forecast
- TEX 57%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- TEX 53%
- Ratings vs. market
- −4.6 pts
- TEX: Elo 52.8%, market 57.4%
- Fair odds
- TEX -135
- TOR +135 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- TOR 3.4 – 4.1 TEX
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 7.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | TOR | TEX | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1489 | 1488 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +18 | Worth 18 Elo in MLB |
| Starting pitchers | +1 | +4 | TOR: Bowden Francis: team allows 0.05 fewer runs than with its usual starter (≈9 weighted starts) · TEX: Nathan Eovaldi: team allows 0.22 fewer runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | TEX +20 Elo | TEX 52.8% | |
| Market-implied ratings | TEX 57.2% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | TEX 56.6% | 15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | TEX 57.4% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest.
| TOR | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 24th of 303.9 | Runs scored | 3.327th of 30 |
| 21st of 304.4 | Runs allowed | 3.54th of 30 |
| 22nd of 30−0.5 | Margin | −0.220th of 30 |
| 15th of 305–5 | Last 10 | 2–828th of 30 |
| 21st of 3010–15 | Road vs home | 17–1114th of 30 |
| 4th of 301508 | Opponent Elo | 149525th of 30 |
| 21st of 301489 | Elo rating | 148822nd of 30 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Run line | 31–22 | 25–30 |
| Last 10 | 6–4 | 3–7 |
| Favorite | 13–11 | 12–19 |
| Underdog | 18–11 | 13–11 |
| Overs–unders | 26–27 | 17–38 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 4–6 | 3–7 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
TOR 6–8 TEX in their last 14 meetings; the forecast called 6 of 14.



