Buffalo Sabres at Boston Bruins, NHL forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with every score and the time left. Above the line favors BOS; hover for each play.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
- Bowen ByramGoals1
- Bowen ByramAssists1
- Alex TuchPoints2
- Sean KuralyGoals1
- Andrew PeekeAssists1
- Sean KuralyPoints1
Scoring summary
- P319:20
Sean Kuraly Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: Mark Kastelic (1), Andrew Peeke (1)6–1 - P36:32
Alex Tuch Goal (3) Wrist Shot, assists: Tage Thompson (2), Peyton Krebs (3)6–0 - P35:08
Beck Malenstyn Goal (1) Tip-In, assists: Jordan Greenway (1), Tyson Kozak (1)5–0 - P114:24
Bowen Byram Goal (3) Wrist Shot, assists: Owen Power (4), Jack Quinn (3)4–0 - P19:15
Zach Benson Goal (1) Deflected, assists: Josh Doan (1)3–0 - P17:10
Josh Doan Goal (1) Tip-In, assists: Ryan McLeod (1), Bowen Byram (2)2–0 - P14:17
Peyton Krebs Goal (2) Wrist Shot, assists: Alex Tuch (3)1–0
Turning points
The 5 plays that swung the win chance most, each judged at its own moment: the chance with the score just before it against just after.
- P14:17
Peyton Krebs Goal (2) Wrist Shot, assists: Alex Tuch (3)BUF 1 – 0 BOS · BUF 47% → 62% +15BUF 47% → 62%+15 pts - P17:10
Josh Doan Goal (1) Tip-In, assists: Ryan McLeod (1), Bowen Byram (2)BUF 2 – 0 BOS · BUF 63% → 76% +13BUF 63% → 76%+13 pts - P19:15
Zach Benson Goal (1) Deflected, assists: Josh Doan (1)BUF 3 – 0 BOS · BUF 77% → 87% +10BUF 77% → 87%+10 pts - P114:24
Bowen Byram Goal (3) Wrist Shot, assists: Owen Power (4), Jack Quinn (3)BUF 4 – 0 BOS · BUF 88% → 95% +6BUF 88% → 95%+6 pts - P35:08
Beck Malenstyn Goal (1) Tip-In, assists: Jordan Greenway (1), Tyson Kozak (1)BUF 5 – 0 BOS · BUF >99% → >99% +0BUF >99% → >99%+0 pts
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Bruins 53%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: NHL favorites the forecast gave 50–55% have won 51.2% of 926 graded games.
- Market
- BOS 53%
- ML BUF +102 / BOS -122
- Pre-line forecast
- BOS 51%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- BOS 49%
- Ratings vs. market
- −3.4 pts
- BOS: Elo 49.2%, market 52.6%
- Fair odds
- BOS -111
- BUF +111 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- BUF 2.7 – 2.8 BOS
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 5.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | BUF | BOS | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1556 | 1511 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +35 | Worth 35 Elo in the NHL |
| Starting goalies | +1 | +5 | BUF: Alex Lyon: team allows 0.02 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈44 weighted starts) · BOS: Jeremy Swayman: team allows 0.13 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈48 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | BUF +5 Elo | BUF 50.8% | |
| Market-implied ratings | BOS 51.6% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | BOS 51.2% | 20% Elo, 80% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | BOS 52.6% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Overtime and shootout losses count as losses in these records. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest. Shot share is a team's share of the shots on goal in its games. PDO adds shooting and save percentages: far from 100 tends to even out.
| BUF | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 5th of 323.5 | Goals scored | 3.311th of 32 |
| 7th of 322.9 | Goals allowed | 3.013th of 32 |
| 5th of 32+0.6 | Margin | +0.311th of 32 |
| 19th of 3249.2% | Shot share | 47.6%26th of 32 |
| 3rd of 3290.7% | Save percentage | 90.3%7th of 32 |
| 8th of 326–4 | Last 10 | 5–516th of 32 |
| 2nd of 3224–17 | Road vs home | 29–121st of 32 |
| 13th of 321502 | Opponent Elo | 15044th of 32 |
| 5th of 321556 | Elo rating | 151113th of 32 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Puck line | 49–36 | 56–29 |
| Last 10 | 6–4 | 7–3 |
| Favorite | 19–25 | 12–16 |
| Underdog | 30–11 | 44–13 |
| Overs–unders | 41–44 | 44–41 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 4–6 | 2–8 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
BUF 7–7 BOS in their last 14 meetings; the forecast called 7 of 14.
- Apr 23
BUF 3 @ BOS 1PlayoffsPicked BOS 51%Miss - Apr 21
BOS 4 @ BUF 2PlayoffsPicked BUF 60%Miss - Apr 19
BOS 3 @ BUF 4PlayoffsPicked BUF 60%Hit - Mar 25
BOS 4 @ BUF 3Picked BUF 64%Miss - Dec 27
BOS 1 @ BUF 4Picked BUF 55%Hit - Oct 30
BUF 3 @ BOS 4Picked BUF 56%Miss - Oct 11
BUF 1 @ BOS 3Picked BOS 50%Hit - Apr 6
BOS 3 @ BUF 6Picked BUF 63%Hit



