Cincinnati Bengals at Washington Commanders, NFL forecast
- The pick
- CIN · Solid
- Line
- CIN -3.5
- Projected
- 28–24
- Fair odds
- -184
Your pick
The short version
- The betting line has the Bengals favored by 3.5, and the forecast follows it (Bengals 65%) because lines have beaten every rating model we've tested.
- Our own ratings like the Bengals more, at 68%.
- Behind our ratings' number: the Bengals rate higher (1574 to 1395 Elo) and the Commanders have home field.
What's at stake
Each team's chance to make the playoffs if it wins this game and if it loses, from 10,000 simulations of the rest of the season.
Bengals
Now 94%
97%
with a win
90%
with a loss
This game is worth 7 points of playoff chance to them.
Commanders
Now 5%
9%
with a win
3%
with a loss
This game is worth 6 points of playoff chance to them.
The pick
Anchored on the betting line, which beat every rating model in testing.
Bengals 65%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: NFL favorites the forecast gave 60–65% have won 63.9% of 119 graded games.
- Market
- CIN -3.5
- ML CIN -205 / WSH +170
- Pre-line forecast
- CIN 67%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- CIN -5.5
- CIN 68%
- Ratings vs. market
- +3.7 pts
- CIN: Elo 68.1%, market 64.5%
- Fair odds
- CIN -184
- WSH +184 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Projected score
- CIN 27.5 – 24.0 WSH
- Posted spread, posted total 51.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | CIN | WSH | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1574 | 1395 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +36 | Worth 36 Elo in the NFL |
| Quarterbacks | +26 | +37 | CIN: Joe Burrow · WSH: Jayden Daniels (against each team's recent starters, from the depth chart and injury report) |
| Elo ratings | CIN +132 Elo | CIN 68.1% | |
| Market-implied ratings | CIN 64.8% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | CIN 67.3% | 75% Elo, 25% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | CIN 64.8% | 93% market, 8% Elo | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest. Adjusted: the scoring model’s ratings a game, which account for who they played. Yards per play counts passes, sacks and runs, with sack yardage taken off.
| CIN | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 2nd of 3230.0 | Points scored | 21.521st of 32 |
| 14th of 3221.9 | Points allowed | 25.324th of 32 |
| 4th of 32+8.1 | Margin | −3.821st of 32 |
| 3rd of 326.08 | Yards per play | 5.2518th of 32 |
| 27th of 325.71 | Yards allowed per play | 5.2514th of 32 |
| 2nd of 323–1 | Road vs home | 2–1–116th of 32 |
| 21st of 321485 | Opponent Elo | 149119th of 32 |
| 11th of 321574 | Elo rating | 139524th of 32 |
| 3rd of 32+2.9 | Offense, adjusted | +0.118th of 32 |
| 24th of 32−1.7 | Defense, adjusted | −1.925th of 32 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Injury report
Current ESPN report. Elo values show what the model subtracts.
Bengals
25 listedDohnte Meyers WR
ActiveMeyers caught two passes for 47 yards on three targets in Sunday's 34-17 win over the Falcons.
Kyle Dugger S
Questionablequestionable
Samaje Perine RB
ActivePerine rushed 11 times for 43 yards during Sunday's 34-17 win over the Falcons.
Myles Hinton OT
ActiveConnor Lew C
ActiveLandon Robinson DT
ActiveAndrei Iosivas WR
Injured ReserveHead coach Zac Taylor said Monday that Iosivas is doing well in his recovery from left thumb surgery, and the Bengals will "continue to work through this week" to determine when the receiver might return from injured reserve, Laurel Pfahler of the Dayton Daily News reports.
Evan McPherson PK
ActiveMcPherson went 2-for-2 on field-goal attempts while making all four of his extra-point tries during Sunday's 34-17 win over the Falcons.
Mike Gesicki TE
ActiveGesicki caught both of his targets for 11 yards during Sunday's 34-17 win versus Atlanta.
Chase Brown RB
ActiveBrown carried the ball nine times for 57 yards and caught all three of his targets for 18 yards in Sunday's 34-17 win over the Falcons.
Tee Higgins WR
ActiveHiggins caught five of six targets for 32 yards and two touchdowns in Sunday's 34-17 win over Atlanta.
Ja'Marr Chase WR
ActiveChase caught 10 of 12 targets for 155 yards and a touchdown in Sunday's 34-17 win over the Falcons.
Commanders
25 listedColson Yankoff TE
QuestionableYankoff (knee) did not participate in Tuesday's walkthrough practice.
Treylon Burks WR
Questionablequestionable
Chig Okonkwo TE
ActiveOkonkwo (hip) was a full participant in Tuesday's practice.
Shy Tuttle DT
ActiveLucas Patrick G
Doubtfuldoubtful
Antonio Williams WR
ActiveWilliams caught three passes for 25 yards on six targets in Sunday's 20-13 loss to the Rams.
Drew Stevens PK
ActiveStevens made both of his field-goal attempts and his only PAT during Sunday's 20-13 loss to the Rams.
Austin Ekeler RB
ActiveEkeler rushed eight times for 16 yards and caught two of three targets for 18 yards during Sunday's 20-13 loss to the Rams.
Isaac Yiadom CB
ActiveTanoa Togiai G
ActiveFabian Moreau CB
ActiveAthan Kaliakmanis QB
Active
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Against the spread | 4–4 | 4–4 |
| Last 10 | 4–4 | 4–4 |
| Favorite | 3–4 | 1–1 |
| Underdog | 1–0 | 3–3 |
| Overs–unders | 5–3 | 4–4 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 5–3 | 4–4 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
CIN 0–1 WSH in their last 1 meeting; the forecast called 0 of 1.



