Skip to content
ShadowCryptsPredictions
Live
NFL games
Updated

Chicago Bears at Baltimore Ravens, NFL forecast

FinalCBS

Away

Bears

4-3

16–30

at

Home

Ravens

2-5

CHI 45%BAL 55%

You didn't pick this one.

M&T Bank Stadium · CBS

Win probability

Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with every score and the time left. Above the line favors BAL; hover for each play.

BAL favored CHI favored10 scoring plays
Q1Q2Q3Q4BAL50%CHI

Game center

From the ESPN box score.

Top performers

Bears
Ravens

Scoring summary

  • Q42:09Derrick Henry 2 Yd Rush (Tyler Loop Kick)16–30
  • Q45:06Cairo Santos 47 Yd Field Goal16–23
  • Q48:13Charlie Kolar 10 Yd pass from Tyler Huntley (Tyler Loop Kick)13–23
  • Q412:22D'Andre Swift 2 Yd Rush (Cairo Santos Kick)13–16
  • Q33:35Tyler Loop 32 Yd Field Goal6–16
  • Q310:05Tyler Loop 28 Yd Field Goal6–13
  • Q21:06Tyler Loop 42 Yd Field Goal6–10
  • Q28:15Derrick Henry 2 Yd Rush (Tyler Loop Kick)6–7
  • Q10:03Cairo Santos 39 Yd Field Goal6–0
  • Q16:50Cairo Santos 32 Yd Field Goal3–0

Turning points

The 5 plays that swung the win chance most, each judged at its own moment: the chance with the score just before it against just after.

  1. Q28:15Derrick Henry 2 Yd Rush (Tyler Loop Kick)CHI 6 – 7 BAL · BAL 36% → 57% +22
  2. Q21:06Tyler Loop 42 Yd Field GoalCHI 6 – 10 BAL · BAL 57% → 67% +10
  3. Q310:05Tyler Loop 28 Yd Field GoalCHI 6 – 13 BAL · BAL 68% → 78% +10
  4. Q412:22D'Andre Swift 2 Yd Rush (Cairo Santos Kick)CHI 13 – 16 BAL · CHI 7% → 32% +24
  5. Q48:13Charlie Kolar 10 Yd pass from Tyler Huntley (Tyler Loop Kick)CHI 13 – 23 BAL · BAL 71% → 96% +25

The pick

Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.

Ravens 55%

LeanHit
CHI 45%BAL 55%

Forecast Elo ratings alone

How often that comes true: NFL favorites the forecast gave 55–60% have won 62.9% of 143 graded games.

Market
BAL -2.5
ML CHI +125 / BAL -145
Pre-line forecast
BAL 37%
Elo + market-implied
Elo ratings
CHI -5
BAL 33%
Ratings vs. market
−24.0 pts
BAL: Elo 33.2%, market 57.1%
Fair odds
BAL -124
CHI +124 · the forecast as odds, no margin
Pregame projection
CHI 21.0 – 23.5 BAL
Posted spread, posted total 44.5

How the number is built

Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.

FactorCHIBALWhy
Team rating14911537Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average
Home field—+36Worth 36 Elo in the NFL
Quarterbacks+2−202CHI: Caleb Williams · BAL: Tyler Huntley, usually Lamar Jackson (against each team's recent starters, from the box score)
Elo ratingsCHI +122 EloCHI 66.8%
Market-implied ratingsBAL 51.2%Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context
Pre-line forecastCHI 62.6%75% Elo, 25% market-implied (log-odds blend)
ForecastBAL 55.3%93% market, 8% Elo

Tale of the tape

This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest. Yards per play counts passes, sacks and runs, with sack yardage taken off.

Try another venue →
Chicago Bears and Baltimore Ravens compared, with each team's league rank
CHIStatBAL
10th of 3225.3Points scored24.015th of 32
25th of 3225.8Points allowed32.332nd of 32
19th of 32−0.5Margin−8.327th of 32
14th of 325.57Yards per play5.7111th of 32
32nd of 326.19Yards allowed per play5.6727th of 32
6th of 322–1Road vs home1–328th of 32
23rd of 321484Opponent Elo15751st of 32
19th of 321491Elo rating153712th of 32

Rating history

Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.

BearsRavens
1350145015501650league averageSepDecMarJunSep

Against the line

How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.

This seasonCHIBAL
Against the spread4–21–5
Last 104–21–5
Favorite1–11–3
Underdog3–10–2
Overs–unders4–25–1
Overs–unders, last 104–25–1

Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.