Skip to content
ShadowCryptsPredictions
Live
NBA games
Updated

Memphis Grizzlies at New Orleans Pelicans, NBA forecast

FinalTNT

Away

Grizzlies

7-19

115–113

at

Home

Pelicans

16-12

MEM 17%NO 83%

You didn't pick this one.

Smoothie King Center · TNT

Win probability

Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with every score and the time left. Above the line favors NO; hover for each play.

NO favored MEM favored126 scoring plays
Q1Q2Q3Q4NO50%MEM

Game center

From the ESPN box score.

Top performers

Grizzlies
Pelicans

Last plays

  • Q40.0End of Game115–113
  • Q40.0End of the 4th Quarter115–113
  • Q40.0(00:00) [Grizzlies] REF-INITIATED REVIEW (REPLAY SUPPORTS CALL)115–113
  • Q40.0Ja Morant makes driving layup115–113
  • Q49.1Santi Aldama enters the game for Xavier Tillman113–113
  • Q49.1Trey Murphy III enters the game for Jonas Valanciunas113–113
  • Q49.1Naji Marshall enters the game for CJ McCollum113–113
  • Q49.1Dyson Daniels enters the game for Zion Williamson113–113
  • Q49.1Grizzlies Full timeout113–113
  • Q49.1Ja Morant defensive rebound113–113

Turning points

The 5 plays that swung the win chance most, each judged at its own moment: the chance with the score just before it against just after.

  1. Q41:22Ja Morant makes 6-foot jumperMEM 111 – 109 NO · MEM 44% → 68% +24
  2. Q41:07Jonas Valanciunas makes two point shotMEM 111 – 111 NO · NO 30% → 56% +26
  3. Q456.0Ja Morant makes driving layupMEM 113 – 111 NO · MEM 45% → 73% +28
  4. Q451.1Herbert Jones makes driving layup (CJ McCollum assists)MEM 113 – 113 NO · NO 26% → 55% +29
  5. Q40.0Ja Morant makes driving layupMEM 115 – 113 NO · MEM 38% → 100% +62

The pick

Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point.

Pelicans 83%

StrongMiss
MEM 17%NO 83%

Forecast Elo ratings alone

How often that comes true: NBA favorites the forecast gave 80–85% have won 81.1% of 286 graded games.

Market
No line yet
Pre-line forecast
NO 83%
Elo + market-implied
Elo ratings
NO -11.5
NO 87%
Fair odds
NO -495
MEM +495 · the forecast as odds, no margin
Pregame projection
MEM 105.7 – 117.9 NO
Margin from the forecast, total from team scoring ratings

How the number is built

Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.

FactorMEMNOWhy
Team rating14181541Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average
Home field—+36Worth 36 Elo in the NBA
Rest−40—MEM on the second night of a back-to-back
Lineups−18+110MEM: Missing Derrick Rose −4 · otherwise weaker than recent lineups · NO: Stronger than its recent lineups (from the box score)
Elo ratingsNO +327 EloNO 86.8%
Market-implied ratingsNO 82.7%Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context
Pre-line forecastNO 83.2%10% Elo, 90% market-implied (log-odds blend)

Tale of the tape

This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Offense and defense are points per 100 possessions, which sets aside how fast a team plays.

Try another venue →
Memphis Grizzlies and New Orleans Pelicans compared, with each team's league rank
MEMStatNO
30th of 30105.6Points scored116.012th of 30
11th of 30112.4Points allowed113.815th of 30
24th of 30−6.8Margin+2.111th of 30
30th of 30103.8Offense rating113.815th of 30
9th of 30110.4Defense rating111.712th of 30
15th of 30101.4Pace101.912th of 30
23rd of 303–7Last 107–35th of 30
19th of 305–8Road vs home9–412th of 30

Who's playing

Who sat out, from the box score, and what each absence cost against the lineups the team had been playing.

All player ratings →

Grizzlies

−18 Elo
  • Derrick Rose left hamstring strain−4 Elo

Pelicans

+110 Elo

Full strength: nobody who matters sat out.

Rating history

Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.

GrizzliesPelicans
130013501400145015001550league averageNovJanMarMayJulSepNov

Head to head

MEM 0–1 NO in their last 1 meeting; the forecast called 0 of 1.