Skip to content
ShadowCryptsPredictions
Live
NBA games
Updated

Milwaukee Bucks at Chicago Bulls, NBA forecast

Final/OTNBC Sports Chi +, FanDuel SN WI

Away

Bucks

13-6

113–120

at

Home

Bulls

6-14

MIL 73%CHI 27%

You didn't pick this one.

United Center · NBC Sports Chi +, FanDuel SN WI

Win probability

Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with every score and the time left. Above the line favors CHI; hover for each play.

CHI favored MIL favored115 scoring plays
Q1Q2Q3Q4OTCHI50%MIL

Game center

From the ESPN box score.

Top performers

Bulls

Last plays

  • OT0.0End of Game113–120
  • OT0.0End of the 1st Overtime113–120
  • OT0.0Bucks offensive team rebound113–120
  • OT0.0Malik Beasley misses 41-foot three point jumper113–120
  • OT2.2Patrick Williams makes 1-foot dunk113–120
  • OT3.1Giannis Antetokounmpo bad pass (Patrick Williams steals)113–118
  • OT6.0Bucks Full timeout113–118
  • OT6.1Bobby Portis defensive rebound113–118
  • OT8.1Coby White misses free throw 2 of 2113–118
  • OT8.1Coby White makes free throw 1 of 2113–118

Turning points

The 5 plays that swung the win chance most, each judged at its own moment: the chance with the score just before it against just after.

  1. Q43:02Malik Beasley makes 22-foot three point jumper (Damian Lillard assists)MIL 96 – 98 CHI · MIL 19% → 40% +21
  2. Q421.1Brook Lopez makes 23-foot three point jumper (Damian Lillard assists)MIL 104 – 103 CHI · MIL 12% → 75% +62
  3. Q40.0Alex Caruso makes 28-foot three point jumper (Nikola Vucevic assists)MIL 106 – 106 CHI · CHI 0% → 42% +42
  4. OT3:36Coby White makes 23-foot step back jumpshotMIL 108 – 109 CHI · CHI 29% → 51% +22
  5. OT1:14Ayo Dosunmu makes two point shotMIL 110 – 113 CHI · CHI 59% → 81% +22

The pick

Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point.

Bucks 73%

StrongMiss
MIL 73%CHI 27%

Forecast Elo ratings alone

How often that comes true: NBA favorites the forecast gave 70–75% have won 75.3% of 360 graded games.

Market
No line yet
Pre-line forecast
MIL 73%
Elo + market-implied
Elo ratings
MIL -7.5
MIL 78%
Fair odds
MIL -270
CHI +270 · the forecast as odds, no margin
Pregame projection
MIL 118.7 – 111.2 CHI
Margin from the forecast, total from team scoring ratings

How the number is built

Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.

FactorMILCHIWhy
Team rating15491438Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average
Home field—+36Worth 36 Elo in the NBA
Lineups+112−27MIL: Stronger than its recent lineups · CHI: Weaker than its recent lineups (from the box score)
Elo ratingsMIL +215 EloMIL 77.5%
Market-implied ratingsMIL 72.5%Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context
Pre-line forecastMIL 73.0%10% Elo, 90% market-implied (log-odds blend)

Tale of the tape

This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Offense and defense are points per 100 possessions, which sets aside how fast a team plays.

Try another venue →
Milwaukee Bucks and Chicago Bulls compared, with each team's league rank
MILStatCHI
3rd of 30120.9Points scored106.228th of 30
22nd of 30117.8Points allowed112.815th of 30
11th of 30+3.1Margin−6.723rd of 30
3rd of 30117.3Offense rating108.226th of 30
20th of 30114.3Defense rating115.022nd of 30
5th of 30102.9Pace97.130th of 30
2nd of 308–2Last 102–826th of 30
9th of 305–4Road vs home4–622nd of 30

Who's playing

Who sat out, from the box score, and what each absence cost against the lineups the team had been playing.

All player ratings →

Bucks

+112 Elo

Full strength: nobody who matters sat out.

Bulls

−27 Elo

Full strength: nobody who matters sat out.

Rating history

Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.

BucksBulls
1300135014001450150015501600league averageNovJanMarMayJulSepNov

Head to head

MIL 1–0 CHI in their last 1 meeting; the forecast called 1 of 1.