Pittsburgh Pirates at Milwaukee Brewers, MLB forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors MIL.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
Pirates- Endy RodriguezBatting1-3, 1 HR, 2 RBI
- Paul SkenesPitching5.0 IP, 3 ER, 6 K
Brewers- William ContrerasBatting1-3, 1 HR, 1 RBI
- Kyle HarrisonPitching5.0 IP, 0 ER, 10 K
Scoring summary
- 7Rodríguez homered to left center (378 feet), Reynolds scored.2–4
- 6Contreras homered to left center (400 feet).0–4
- 4Vaughn singled to right, Contreras scored and Yelich scored.0–3
- 4Yelich doubled to right, Mitchell scored, Contreras to third.0–1
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Brewers 55%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 55–60% have won 55.5% of 2,596 graded games.
- Market
- MIL 55%
- ML PIT +120 / MIL -128
- Pre-line forecast
- MIL 56%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- MIL 63%
- Ratings vs. market
- +7.4 pts
- MIL: Elo 62.6%, market 55.3%
- Fair odds
- MIL -124
- PIT +124 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- PIT 3.3 – 3.7 MIL
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 7
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | PIT | MIL | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1499 | 1561 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +18 | Worth 18 Elo in MLB |
| Starting pitchers | −12 | −2 | PIT: Paul Skenes: team allows 0.59 more runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts) · MIL: Kyle Harrison: team allows 0.12 more runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | MIL +90 Elo | MIL 62.6% | |
| Market-implied ratings | MIL 54.4% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | MIL 55.6% | 15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | MIL 55.3% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest.
| PIT | Stat | MIL |
|---|---|---|
| 3rd of 305.1 | Runs scored | 5.05th of 30 |
| 23rd of 304.8 | Runs allowed | 3.82nd of 30 |
| 10th of 30+0.3 | Margin | +1.22nd of 30 |
| 19th of 304–6 | Last 10 | 6–48th of 30 |
| 14th of 3028–30 | Road vs home | 37–213rd of 30 |
| 4th of 301504 | Opponent Elo | 149527th of 30 |
| 14th of 301499 | Elo rating | 15611st of 30 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season |  PIT |  MIL |
|---|---|---|
| Run line | 52–63 | 61–52 |
| Last 10 | 2–8 | 6–4 |
| Favorite | 22–39 | 40–43 |
| Underdog | 30–24 | 21–9 |
| Overs–unders | 64–48–3 | 49–61–3 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 4–6 | 4–6 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
PIT 20–27 MIL in their last 47 meetings; the forecast called 32 of 47.