Milwaukee Brewers at San Diego Padres, MLB forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors SD.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
Brewers- Danny JansenBatting2-3, 1 HR, 1 RBI
- Chad PatrickPitching3.0 IP, 0 ER, 6 K
Padres- Jackson MerrillBatting1-4, 1 HR, 1 RBI
- Dylan CeasePitching5.0 IP, 1 ER, 8 K
Scoring summary
- 9Jansen homered to left (392 feet).3–1
- 7Turang singled to center, Chourio scored.2–1
- 6Merrill homered to left (344 feet).1–1
- 5Vaughn doubled to left, Turang scored.1–0
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Padres 57%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 55–60% have won 55.5% of 2,596 graded games.
- Market
- SD 57%
- ML MIL +120 / SD -145
- Pre-line forecast
- SD 56%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- SD 48%
- Ratings vs. market
- −8.1 pts
- SD: Elo 48.4%, market 56.6%
- Fair odds
- SD -130
- MIL +130 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- MIL 3.5 – 4.0 SD
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 7.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | MIL | SD | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1564 | 1529 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +18 | Worth 18 Elo in MLB |
| Starting pitchers | −5 | +2 | MIL: Chad Patrick: team allows 0.25 more runs than with its usual starter (≈9 weighted starts) · SD: Dylan Cease: team allows 0.09 fewer runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | MIL +11 Elo | MIL 51.6% | |
| Market-implied ratings | SD 57.0% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | SD 55.7% | 15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | SD 56.6% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest.
| MIL | Stat | SD |
|---|---|---|
| 3rd of 305.0 | Runs scored | 4.319th of 30 |
| 3rd of 303.9 | Runs allowed | 3.92nd of 30 |
| 1st of 30+1.1 | Margin | +0.410th of 30 |
| 12th of 305–5 | Last 10 | 7–35th of 30 |
| 1st of 3044–36 | Road vs home | 49–286th of 30 |
| 23rd of 301497 | Opponent Elo | 149627th of 30 |
| 1st of 301564 | Elo rating | 15298th of 30 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season |  MIL |  SD |
|---|---|---|
| Run line | 87–71 | 86–72 |
| Last 10 | 4–6 | 5–5 |
| Favorite | 44–51 | 39–51 |
| Underdog | 43–20 | 47–21 |
| Overs–unders | 79–79 | 69–89 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 5–5 | 6–4 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
MIL 9–10 SD in their last 19 meetings; the forecast called 10 of 19.