Skip to content
ShadowCryptsPredictions
Live
MLB games
Updated

Cleveland Guardians at Cincinnati Reds, MLB forecast

FinalESPN+

Away

Guardians

43-23

2–4

at

Home

Reds

33-35

CLE 50%CIN 50%

You didn't pick this one.

Great American Ball Park · ESPN+

Win probability

Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors CIN.

CIN75%50%75%CLEStart1234567Final

Game center

From the ESPN box score.

Top performers

Guardians
  • Steven KwanBatting2-5
  • Tanner BibeePitching5.1 IP, 4 ER, 11 K
Reds
  • Jeimer CandelarioBatting3-4, 2 HR, 4 RBI
  • Nick LodoloPitching6.0 IP, 2 ER, 6 K

Scoring summary

  • 6Candelario homered to right (343 feet), Benson scored and Friedl scored.2–4
  • 6Pitch 8 : Ball In Play2–4
  • 6Pitch 7 : Strike 2 Foul2–1
  • 6Pitch 6 : Ball 32–1
  • 6Pitch 5 : Ball 22–1
  • 6Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul2–1
  • 6Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul2–1
  • 6Pitch 2 : Ball 12–1
  • 6Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul2–1
  • 5Giménez grounded out to second, Ramírez scored, J. Naylor to second.2–1
  • 5Pitch 2 : Ball In Play2–1
  • 5Pitch 1 : Ball 11–1
  • 3Fry walked, Kwan scored, J. Naylor to second, Ramírez to third.1–1
  • 3Pitch 6 : Ball 41–1
  • 3Pitch 5 : Ball 30–1
  • 3Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul0–1
  • 3Pitch 3 : Ball 20–1
  • 3Pitch 2 : Ball 10–1
  • 3Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging0–1
  • 1Candelario homered to center (404 feet).0–1
  • 1Pitch 1 : Ball In Play0–1

The pick

Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.

Reds 50%

Toss-upHit
CLE 50%CIN 50%

Forecast Elo ratings alone

How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 50–55% have won 52.7% of 2,871 graded games.

Market
CIN 50%
ML CLE -110 / CIN -110
Pre-line forecast
CIN 50%
Elo + market-implied
Elo ratings
CIN 48%
Ratings vs. market
−2.3 pts
CIN: Elo 47.7%, market 50.0%
Fair odds
CIN -100
CLE -100 · the forecast as odds, no margin
Pregame projection
CLE 3.8 – 3.8 CIN
Margin from the forecast, posted total 7.5

How the number is built

Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.

FactorCLECINWhy
Team rating15261499Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average
Home field—+18Worth 18 Elo in MLB
Starting pitchers+15+8CLE: Tanner Bibee: team allows 0.73 fewer runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts) · CIN: Nick Lodolo: team allows 0.39 fewer runs than with its usual starter (≈8 weighted starts)
Elo ratingsCLE +16 EloCLE 52.3%
Market-implied ratingsCIN 50.0%Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context
Pre-line forecastCLE 50.3%15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend)
ForecastCIN 50.0%Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate

Tale of the tape

This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road.

Try another venue →
Cleveland Guardians and Cincinnati Reds compared, with each team's league rank
CLEStatCIN
4th of 305.1Runs scored4.314th of 30
5th of 303.7Runs allowed4.111th of 30
5th of 30+1.4Margin+0.211th of 30
7th of 306–4Last 107–34th of 30
4th of 3022–14Road vs home17–1920th of 30

Rating history

Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.

GuardiansReds
145015001550league averageAprAugDecAprAug

Against the line

How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.

This seasonCLECIN
Run line41–2435–32
Last 106–45–5
Favorite19–1915–19
Underdog22–520–13
Overs–unders32–31–231–35–1
Overs–unders, last 104–64–6

Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.

Head to head

CLE 3–2 CIN in their last 5 meetings; the forecast called 2 of 5.