Pittsburgh Penguins at Philadelphia Flyers, NHL forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with every score and the time left. Above the line favors PHI; hover for each play.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
- Sidney CrosbyGoals1
- Sidney CrosbyAssists1
- Sidney CrosbyPoints2
- Denver BarkeyGoals1
- Travis SanheimAssists1
- Travis KonecnyPoints1
Scoring summary
- P319:03
Connor Dewar Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: Blake Lizotte (1), Noel Acciari (1)4–2 - P37:03
Travis Konecny Goal (1) Snap Shot, assists: Christian Dvorak (3), Travis Sanheim (1)3–2 - P34:27
Kris Letang Goal (1) Slap Shot, assists: Sidney Crosby (2), Rickard Rakell (3)3–1 - P215:40
Denver Barkey Goal (1) Tip-In, assists: Trevor Zegras (3), Cam York (1)2–1 - P21:03
Rickard Rakell Goal (1) Backhand, assists: none2–0 - P114:24
Sidney Crosby Goal (1) Slap Shot, assists: Erik Karlsson (2)1–0
Turning points
The 5 plays that swung the win chance most, each judged at its own moment: the chance with the score just before it against just after.
- P114:24
Sidney Crosby Goal (1) Slap Shot, assists: Erik Karlsson (2)PIT 1 – 0 PHI · PIT 47% → 64% +16PIT 47% → 64%+16 pts - P21:03
Rickard Rakell Goal (1) Backhand, assists: nonePIT 2 – 0 PHI · PIT 65% → 80% +15PIT 65% → 80%+15 pts - P215:40
Denver Barkey Goal (1) Tip-In, assists: Trevor Zegras (3), Cam York (1)PIT 2 – 1 PHI · PHI 14% → 30% +16PHI 14% → 30%+16 pts - P34:27
Kris Letang Goal (1) Slap Shot, assists: Sidney Crosby (2), Rickard Rakell (3)PIT 3 – 1 PHI · PIT 75% → 92% +17PIT 75% → 92%+17 pts - P37:03
Travis Konecny Goal (1) Snap Shot, assists: Christian Dvorak (3), Travis Sanheim (1)PIT 3 – 2 PHI · PHI 6% → 23% +16PHI 6% → 23%+16 pts
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Flyers 53%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: NHL favorites the forecast gave 50–55% have won 51.2% of 926 graded games.
- Market
- PHI 53%
- ML PIT +105 / PHI -125
- Pre-line forecast
- PHI 56%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- PHI 59%
- Ratings vs. market
- +5.9 pts
- PHI: Elo 59.1%, market 53.2%
- Fair odds
- PHI -114
- PIT +114 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- PIT 2.7 – 2.8 PHI
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 5.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | PIT | PHI | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1497 | 1513 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +35 | Worth 35 Elo in the NHL |
| Starting goalies | −3 | +9 | PIT: Arturs Silovs: team allows 0.08 more goals than with its usual starter (≈35 weighted starts) · PHI: Dan Vladar: team allows 0.23 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈44 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | PHI +64 Elo | PHI 59.1% | |
| Market-implied ratings | PHI 55.8% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | PHI 56.5% | 20% Elo, 80% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | PHI 53.2% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Overtime and shootout losses count as losses in these records. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest. Shot share is a team's share of the shots on goal in its games. PDO adds shooting and save percentages: far from 100 tends to even out.
| PIT | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 3rd of 323.6 | Goals scored | 3.020th of 32 |
| 24th of 323.3 | Goals allowed | 3.09th of 32 |
| 10th of 32+0.3 | Margin | +0.115th of 32 |
| 11th of 3251.1% | Shot share | 50.0%16th of 32 |
| 24th of 3289.1% | Save percentage | 89.1%23rd of 32 |
| 16th of 325–5 | Last 10 | 7–32nd of 32 |
| 9th of 3221–19 | Road vs home | 20–2121st of 32 |
| 7th of 321504 | Opponent Elo | 150310th of 32 |
| 18th of 321497 | Elo rating | 151312th of 32 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Puck line | 47–38 | 55–30 |
| Last 10 | 3–7 | 7–3 |
| Favorite | 13–22 | 11–14 |
| Underdog | 34–16 | 44–16 |
| Overs–unders | 49–36 | 43–42 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 7–3 | 4–6 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
PIT 6–9 PHI in their last 15 meetings; the forecast called 9 of 15.
- Apr 22
PIT 2 @ PHI 5PlayoffsPicked PHI 51%Hit - Apr 20
PHI 3 @ PIT 0PlayoffsPicked PIT 58%Miss - Apr 18
PHI 3 @ PIT 2PlayoffsPicked PIT 56%Miss - Mar 7
PHI 4 @ PIT 3Picked PIT 56%Miss - Jan 15
PHI 3 @ PIT 6Picked PIT 61%Hit - Dec 1
PIT 5 @ PHI 1Picked PHI 57%Miss - Oct 28
PIT 2 @ PHI 3Picked PHI 61%Hit - Feb 27
PHI 4 @ PIT 5Picked PIT 51%Hit



