Minnesota Wild at Dallas Stars, NHL forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with every score and the time left. Above the line favors DAL; hover for each play.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
- Kirill KaprizovGoals1
- Kirill KaprizovAssists2
- Kirill KaprizovPoints3
- Miro HeiskanenGoals1
- Miro HeiskanenAssists1
- Miro HeiskanenPoints2
Scoring summary
- P318:00
Kirill Kaprizov Goal (2) Backhand, assists: Matt Boldy (3), Jake Middleton (1)4–2 - P316:39
Jason Robertson Goal (5) Snap Shot, assists: Miro Heiskanen (4), Mikko Rantanen (5)3–2 - P37:47
Michael McCarron Goal (2) Snap Shot, assists: Yakov Trenin (1), Vladimir Tarasenko (1)3–1 - P219:28
Matt Boldy Goal (4) Snap Shot, assists: Quinn Hughes (5), Kirill Kaprizov (7)2–1 - P18:58
Miro Heiskanen Goal (2) Slap Shot, assists: Jason Robertson (3), Matt Duchene (6)1–1 - P13:51
Mats Zuccarello Goal (1) Snap Shot, assists: Kirill Kaprizov (6), Ryan Hartman (3)1–0
Turning points
The 5 plays that swung the win chance most, each judged at its own moment: the chance with the score just before it against just after.
- P13:51
Mats Zuccarello Goal (1) Snap Shot, assists: Kirill Kaprizov (6), Ryan Hartman (3)MIN 1 – 0 DAL · MIN 47% → 62% +15MIN 47% → 62%+15 pts - P18:58
Miro Heiskanen Goal (2) Slap Shot, assists: Jason Robertson (3), Matt Duchene (6)MIN 1 – 1 DAL · DAL 37% → 53% +16DAL 37% → 53%+16 pts - P219:28
Matt Boldy Goal (4) Snap Shot, assists: Quinn Hughes (5), Kirill Kaprizov (7)MIN 2 – 1 DAL · MIN 48% → 72% +24MIN 48% → 72%+24 pts - P37:47
Michael McCarron Goal (2) Snap Shot, assists: Yakov Trenin (1), Vladimir Tarasenko (1)MIN 3 – 1 DAL · MIN 78% → 94% +16MIN 78% → 94%+16 pts - P316:39
Jason Robertson Goal (5) Snap Shot, assists: Miro Heiskanen (4), Mikko Rantanen (5)MIN 3 – 2 DAL · DAL <1% → 6% +6DAL <1% → 6%+6 pts
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Stars 53%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: NHL favorites the forecast gave 50–55% have won 51.2% of 926 graded games.
- Market
- DAL 53%
- ML MIN +105 / DAL -125
- Pre-line forecast
- DAL 56%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- DAL 58%
- Ratings vs. market
- +4.8 pts
- DAL: Elo 58.1%, market 53.2%
- Fair odds
- DAL -114
- MIN +114 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- MIN 2.7 – 2.8 DAL
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 5.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | MIN | DAL | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1534 | 1557 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +35 | Worth 35 Elo in the NHL |
| Starting goalies | +2 | −1 | MIN: Jesper Wallstedt: team allows 0.04 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈29 weighted starts) · DAL: Jake Oettinger: team allows 0.02 more goals than with its usual starter (≈49 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | DAL +56 Elo | DAL 58.1% | |
| Market-implied ratings | DAL 55.7% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | DAL 56.2% | 20% Elo, 80% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | DAL 53.2% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Overtime and shootout losses count as losses in these records. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest. Shot share is a team's share of the shots on goal in its games. PDO adds shooting and save percentages: far from 100 tends to even out.
| MIN | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 11th of 323.3 | Goals scored | 3.48th of 32 |
| 4th of 322.9 | Goals allowed | 2.82nd of 32 |
| 6th of 32+0.4 | Margin | +0.64th of 32 |
| 18th of 3249.8% | Shot share | 49.2%20th of 32 |
| 2nd of 3290.8% | Save percentage | 90.2%9th of 32 |
| 8th of 326–4 | Last 10 | 7–32nd of 32 |
| 7th of 3223–18 | Road vs home | 26–153rd of 32 |
| 27th of 321496 | Opponent Elo | 149725th of 32 |
| 6th of 321534 | Elo rating | 15575th of 32 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Puck line | 42–44 | 35–51 |
| Last 10 | 4–6 | 4–6 |
| Favorite | 14–36 | 19–48 |
| Underdog | 28–8 | 16–3 |
| Overs–unders | 48–38 | 44–42 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 7–3 | 7–3 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
MIN 6–9 DAL in their last 15 meetings; the forecast called 7 of 15.
- Apr 25
DAL 2 @ MIN 3PlayoffsPicked MIN 54%Hit - Apr 22
DAL 4 @ MIN 3PlayoffsPicked MIN 55%Miss - Apr 20
MIN 2 @ DAL 4PlayoffsPicked DAL 56%Hit - Apr 18
MIN 6 @ DAL 1PlayoffsPicked DAL 53%Miss - Apr 9
MIN 4 @ DAL 5Picked DAL 53%Hit - Mar 21
DAL 1 @ MIN 2Picked DAL 55%Miss - Dec 11
DAL 2 @ MIN 5Picked DAL 54%Miss - Oct 14
MIN 2 @ DAL 5Picked DAL 63%Hit



