Vegas Golden Knights at Utah Mammoth, NHL forecast
You didn't pick this one.
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with every score and the time left. Above the line favors UTA; hover for each play.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
- Brett HowdenGoals2
- Jack EichelAssists3
- Brett HowdenPoints3
- Nick SchmaltzGoals1
- Mikhail SergachevAssists3
- Mikhail SergachevPoints3
Scoring summary
- OT19:08
Shea Theodore Goal (1) Snap Shot, assists: Jack Eichel (5), Brett Howden (1)5–4 - P310:25
Brett Howden Goal (2) Tip-In, assists: Noah Hanifin (4), Jack Eichel (4)4–4 - P35:10
Clayton Keller Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: Nick Schmaltz (2), Mikhail Sergachev (3)3–4 - P31:45
Michael Carcone Goal (1) Slap Shot, assists: Dylan Guenther (2), Mikhail Sergachev (2)3–3 - P28:33
Ian Cole Goal (1) Slap Shot, assists: Sean Durzi (2)3–2 - P28:04
Nick Schmaltz Goal (1) Snap Shot, assists: Lawson Crouse (2), Mikhail Sergachev (1)3–1 - P23:26
Cole Smith Goal (1) Tip-In, assists: Noah Hanifin (3), Colton Sissons (2)3–0 - P118:38
Brett Howden Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: Mitch Marner (3)2–0 - P11:12
Pavel Dorofeyev Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: Ivan Barbashev (2), Jack Eichel (3)1–0
Turning points
The 5 plays that swung the win chance most, each judged at its own moment: the chance with the score just before it against just after.
- P28:33
Ian Cole Goal (1) Slap Shot, assists: Sean Durzi (2)VGK 3 – 2 UTA · UTA 14% → 28% +14UTA 14% → 28%+14 pts - P31:45
Michael Carcone Goal (1) Slap Shot, assists: Dylan Guenther (2), Mikhail Sergachev (2)VGK 3 – 3 UTA · UTA 23% → 47% +24UTA 23% → 47%+24 pts - P35:10
Clayton Keller Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: Nick Schmaltz (2), Mikhail Sergachev (3)VGK 3 – 4 UTA · UTA 47% → 75% +27UTA 47% → 75%+27 pts - P310:25
Brett Howden Goal (2) Tip-In, assists: Noah Hanifin (4), Jack Eichel (4)VGK 4 – 4 UTA · VGK 19% → 52% +33VGK 19% → 52%+33 pts - OT19:08
Shea Theodore Goal (1) Snap Shot, assists: Jack Eichel (5), Brett Howden (1)VGK 5 – 4 UTA · VGK 51% → 100% +49VGK 51% → 100%+49 pts
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Golden Knights 55%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: NHL favorites the forecast gave 55–60% have won 56.4% of 1,035 graded games.
- Market
- VGK 55%
- ML VGK -135 / UTA +114
- Pre-line forecast
- VGK 48%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- VGK 44%
- Ratings vs. market
- −11.0 pts
- VGK: Elo 44.1%, market 55.1%
- Fair odds
- VGK -123
- UTA +123 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- VGK 2.9 – 2.6 UTA
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 5.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | VGK | UTA | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1512 | 1517 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +35 | Worth 35 Elo in the NHL |
| Starting goalies | +2 | +2 | VGK: Carter Hart: team allows 0.04 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈30 weighted starts) · UTA: Karel Vejmelka: team allows 0.05 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈46 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | UTA +41 Elo | UTA 55.9% | |
| Market-implied ratings | UTA 50.6% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | UTA 51.7% | 20% Elo, 80% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | VGK 55.1% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Overtime and shootout losses count as losses in these records. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest. Shot share is a team's share of the shots on goal in its games. PDO adds shooting and save percentages: far from 100 tends to even out.
| VGK | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 14th of 323.2 | Goals scored | 3.313th of 32 |
| 13th of 323.0 | Goals allowed | 2.94th of 32 |
| 13th of 32+0.2 | Margin | +0.38th of 32 |
| 3rd of 3254.3% | Shot share | 51.4%8th of 32 |
| 28th of 3288.4% | Save percentage | 89.3%21st of 32 |
| 2nd of 327–3 | Last 10 | 6–48th of 32 |
| 18th of 3219–22 | Road vs home | 22–1914th of 32 |
| 29th of 321495 | Opponent Elo | 149724th of 32 |
| 12th of 321512 | Elo rating | 151711th of 32 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Puck line | 35–50 | 39–46 |
| Last 10 | 6–4 | 5–5 |
| Favorite | 20–48 | 20–36 |
| Underdog | 15–2 | 19–10 |
| Overs–unders | 43–42 | 45–40 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 5–5 | 6–4 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
VGK 4–5 UTA in their last 9 meetings; the forecast called 4 of 9.
- Apr 24
VGK 2 @ UTA 4PlayoffsPicked VGK 50%Miss - Apr 21
UTA 3 @ VGK 2PlayoffsPicked VGK 57%Miss - Apr 19
UTA 2 @ VGK 4PlayoffsPicked VGK 59%Hit - Mar 19
UTA 4 @ VGK 0Picked VGK 55%Miss - Nov 24
VGK 1 @ UTA 5Picked UTA 50%Hit - Nov 20
VGK 4 @ UTA 1Picked UTA 50%Miss - Nov 30
UTAH 6 @ VGK 0Picked VGK 58%Miss - Nov 15
VGK 4 @ UTAH 2Picked VGK 53%Hit



