Edmonton Oilers at Florida Panthers, NHL forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with every score and the time left. Above the line favors FLA; hover for each play.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
- Corey PerryGoals1
- Evan BouchardAssists1
- Corey PerryPoints1
- Carter VerhaegheGoals1
- Carter VerhaegheAssists1
- Carter VerhaeghePoints2
Scoring summary
- P316:10
Evan Rodrigues Goal (2) Slap Shot, assists: Niko Mikkola (3), Gustav Forsling (4)1–6 - P33:27
Aaron Ekblad Goal (4) Snap Shot, assists: Sam Reinhart (10), Matthew Tkachuk (13)1–5 - P27:26
Sam Bennett Goal (14) Wrist Shot, assists: Eetu Luostarinen (12)1–4 - P23:00
Sam Reinhart Goal (5) Wrist Shot, assists: Carter Verhaeghe (12)1–3 - P21:40
Corey Perry Goal (9) Snap Shot, assists: Evan Bouchard (15), Mattias Ekholm (2)1–2 - P117:45
Carter Verhaeghe Goal (7) Snap Shot, assists: Evan Rodrigues (13), Nate Schmidt (9)0–2 - P10:56
Brad Marchand Goal (8) Wrist Shot, assists: Anton Lundell (10), Eetu Luostarinen (11)0–1
Turning points
The 5 plays that swung the win chance most, each judged at its own moment: the chance with the score just before it against just after.
- P10:56
Brad Marchand Goal (8) Wrist Shot, assists: Anton Lundell (10), Eetu Luostarinen (11)EDM 0 – 1 FLA · FLA 57% → 71% +14FLA 57% → 71%+14 pts - P117:45
Carter Verhaeghe Goal (7) Snap Shot, assists: Evan Rodrigues (13), Nate Schmidt (9)EDM 0 – 2 FLA · FLA 72% → 85% +13FLA 72% → 85%+13 pts - P21:40
Corey Perry Goal (9) Snap Shot, assists: Evan Bouchard (15), Mattias Ekholm (2)EDM 1 – 2 FLA · EDM 15% → 27% +13EDM 15% → 27%+13 pts - P23:00
Sam Reinhart Goal (5) Wrist Shot, assists: Carter Verhaeghe (12)EDM 1 – 3 FLA · FLA 73% → 86% +13FLA 73% → 86%+13 pts - P27:26
Sam Bennett Goal (14) Wrist Shot, assists: Eetu Luostarinen (12)EDM 1 – 4 FLA · FLA 87% → 95% +8FLA 87% → 95%+8 pts
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Panthers 57%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: NHL favorites the forecast gave 55–60% have won 56.4% of 1,035 graded games.
- Market
- FLA 57%
- ML EDM +125 / FLA -145
- Pre-line forecast
- FLA 59%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- FLA 55%
- Ratings vs. market
- −2.3 pts
- FLA: Elo 54.8%, market 57.1%
- Fair odds
- FLA -133
- EDM +133 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- EDM 3.0 – 3.5 FLA
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 6.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | EDM | FLA | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1583 | 1580 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +35 | Worth 35 Elo in the NHL |
| Starting goalies | 0 | +2 | EDM: Stuart Skinner: team allows 0.01 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈47 weighted starts) · FLA: Sergei Bobrovsky: team allows 0.04 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈48 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | FLA +33 Elo | FLA 54.8% | |
| Market-implied ratings | FLA 60.2% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | FLA 59.1% | 20% Elo, 80% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | FLA 57.1% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Overtime and shootout losses count as losses in these records. Shot share is a team's share of the shots on goal in its games. PDO adds shooting and save percentages: far from 100 tends to even out.
| EDM | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 11th of 323.2 | Goals scored | 3.114th of 32 |
| 14th of 322.9 | Goals allowed | 2.76th of 32 |
| 11th of 32+0.3 | Margin | +0.410th of 32 |
| 3rd of 3254.3% | Shot share | 54.6%2nd of 32 |
| 19th of 3289.7% | Save percentage | 90.5%10th of 32 |
| 3rd of 327–3 | Last 10 | 3–725th of 32 |
| 4th of 3223–18 | Road vs home | 26–149th of 32 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Puck line | 41–59 | 50–51 |
| Last 10 | 6–4 | 8–2 |
| Favorite | 24–53 | 34–47 |
| Underdog | 17–6 | 16–4 |
| Overs–unders | 47–53 | 51–50 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 6–4 | 7–3 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
EDM 4–9 FLA in their last 13 meetings; the forecast called 8 of 13.
- Jun 6
FLA 5 @ EDM 4PlayoffsPicked EDM 50%Miss - Jun 4
FLA 3 @ EDM 4PlayoffsPicked EDM 52%Hit - Feb 27
EDM 3 @ FLA 4Picked FLA 56%Hit - Dec 16
FLA 6 @ EDM 5Picked EDM 54%Miss - Jun 24
EDM 1 @ FLA 2PlayoffsPicked FLA 55%Hit - Jun 21
FLA 1 @ EDM 5PlayoffsPicked EDM 55%Hit - Jun 18
EDM 5 @ FLA 3PlayoffsPicked FLA 55%Miss - Jun 15
FLA 1 @ EDM 8PlayoffsPicked EDM 54%Hit



