Skip to content
ShadowCryptsPredictions
Live
MLB games
Updated

Colorado Rockies at Chicago Cubs, MLB forecast

FinalMLB.TV, Marquee Sports Net, Rockies.TV

Away

Rockies

27-46

4–5

at

Home

Cubs

38-35

COL 34%CHC 66%

You didn't pick this one.

Wrigley Field · MLB.TV, Marquee Sports Net, Rockies.TV

Win probability

Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors CHC.

CHC75%50%75%COLStart12345678Final

Game center

From the ESPN box score.

Top performers

Rockies
  • Cole CarriggBatting1-3, 1 HR, 4 RBI
  • Michael LorenzenPitching5.0 IP, 1 ER, 5 K
Cubs
  • Pete Crow-ArmstrongBatting4-4, 1 HR, 2 RBI
  • Shota ImanagaPitching5.2 IP, 1 ER, 3 K

Scoring summary

  • 9Shaw walked, Happ scored, Ramirez to second, Hoerner to third.4–5
  • 9Ramirez singled to left, Suzuki scored, Hoerner to second, Happ to third.4–4
  • 8Crow-Armstrong hit sacrifice fly to right, Shaw scored.4–3
  • 8Carrigg homered to left (401 feet), Freeman scored and Goodman scored.4–2
  • 6Shaw tripled to right, Ballesteros scored. Colorado Rockies challenged call on the field was upheld1–2
  • 6Carrigg walked, Freeman scored, Johnston to second, Goodman to third.1–1
  • 1Crow-Armstrong homered to center (434 feet).0–1

The pick

Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.

Cubs 66%

SolidHit
COL 34%CHC 66%

Forecast Elo ratings alone

How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 65–70% have won 69.7% of 518 graded games.

Market
CHC 66%
ML COL +183 / CHC -224
Pre-line forecast
CHC 66%
Elo + market-implied
Elo ratings
CHC 68%
Ratings vs. market
+1.5 pts
CHC: Elo 67.7%, market 66.2%
Fair odds
CHC -196
COL +196 · the forecast as odds, no margin
Pregame projection
COL 4.0 – 5.5 CHC
Margin from the forecast, posted total 9.5

How the number is built

Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.

FactorCOLCHCWhy
Team rating14051518Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average
Home field—+18Worth 18 Elo in MLB
Starting pitchers−3−5COL: Michael Lorenzen: team allows 0.13 more runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts) · CHC: Shota Imanaga: team allows 0.26 more runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts)
Elo ratingsCHC +128 EloCHC 67.7%
Market-implied ratingsCHC 65.6%Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context
Pre-line forecastCHC 65.9%15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend)
ForecastCHC 66.2%Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate

Tale of the tape

This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest.

Try another venue →
Colorado Rockies and Chicago Cubs compared, with each team's league rank
COLStatCHC
11th of 304.6Runs scored4.611th of 30
30th of 305.8Runs allowed4.417th of 30
30th of 30−1.3Margin+0.110th of 30
28th of 303–7Last 105–510th of 30
29th of 3013–25Road vs home20–159th of 30
1st of 301509Opponent Elo149918th of 30
30th of 301405Elo rating15187th of 30

Rating history

Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.

RockiesCubs
135014001450150015501600league averageAprJulOctJanAprJul

Against the line

How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.

This seasonCOLCHC
Run line36–3627–45
Last 103–73–7
Favorite1–316–32
Underdog35–3311–13
Overs–unders34–35–335–32–5
Overs–unders, last 105–53–7

Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.

Head to head

COL 7–14 CHC in their last 21 meetings; the forecast called 14 of 21.