Detroit Tigers at Cleveland Guardians, MLB forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors CLE.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
- Javier BaezBatting2-4, 1 RBI
- Casey MizePitching3.0 IP, 1 ER, 1 K
- Bo NaylorBatting1-4, 1 HR, 3 RBI
- Tanner BibeePitching4.2 IP, 1 ER, 6 K
Scoring summary
- 8
Naylor homered to right (360 feet), Schneemann scored and Ramírez scored.1–6 - 8
Schneemann doubled to right, Kwan scored.1–3 - 8
Rocchio homered to right (376 feet).1–2 - 4
Báez singled to center, Greene scored, Dingler to third, McKinstry thrown out at third.1–1 - 1
Valera homered to center (424 feet).0–1
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Guardians 55%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 55–60% have won 55.5% of 2,596 graded games.
- Market
- CLE 55%
- ML DET +115 / CLE -135
- Pre-line forecast
- CLE 52%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- CLE 56%
- Ratings vs. market
- +0.9 pts
- CLE: Elo 56.1%, market 55.3%
- Fair odds
- CLE -124
- DET +124 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- DET 3.0 – 3.5 CLE
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 6.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | DET | CLE | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1501 | 1514 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +18 | Worth 18 Elo in MLB |
| Starting pitchers | −7 | +5 | DET: Casey Mize: team allows 0.37 more runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts) · CLE: Tanner Bibee: team allows 0.23 fewer runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | CLE +43 Elo | CLE 56.1% | |
| Market-implied ratings | CLE 51.1% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | CLE 51.9% | 15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | CLE 55.3% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest.
| DET | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 11th of 304.7 | Runs scored | 4.028th of 30 |
| 16th of 304.3 | Runs allowed | 4.07th of 30 |
| 11th of 30+0.4 | Margin | 0.019th of 30 |
| 28th of 302–8 | Last 10 | 7–33rd of 30 |
| 5th of 3041–40 | Road vs home | 45–3615th of 30 |
| 26th of 301495 | Opponent Elo | 149528th of 30 |
| 19th of 301501 | Elo rating | 151410th of 30 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Run line | 75–88 | 84–79 |
| Last 10 | 4–6 | 5–5 |
| Favorite | 49–66 | 28–48 |
| Underdog | 26–22 | 56–31 |
| Overs–unders | 87–76 | 73–90 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 3–7 | 3–7 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
DET 23–22 CLE in their last 45 meetings; the forecast called 25 of 45.
- Sep 30
DET 2 @ CLE 1PlayoffsPicked DET 60%Hit - Sep 25
DET 4 @ CLE 2Picked CLE 59%Miss - Sep 24
DET 1 @ CLE 5Picked CLE 57%Hit - Sep 23
DET 2 @ CLE 5Picked DET 59%Miss - Sep 18
CLE 3 @ DET 1Picked DET 67%Miss - Sep 17
CLE 4 @ DET 0Picked DET 57%Miss - Sep 16
CLE 7 @ DET 5Picked DET 57%Miss - Jul 6
DET 7 @ CLE 2Picked DET 67%Hit



