Skip to content
ShadowCryptsPredictions
Live
MLB games
Updated

Kansas City Royals at Chicago White Sox, MLB forecast

FinalFanDuel SN KC, MLB.TV, CHSN

Away

Royals

34-32

7–5

at

Home

White Sox

22-44

KC 52%CHW 48%

You didn't pick this one.

Rate Field · FanDuel SN KC, MLB.TV, CHSN

Win probability

Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors CHW.

CHW75%50%75%KCStart12345678Final

Game center

From the ESPN box score.

Top performers

Royals
  • Bobby Witt Jr.Batting2-5, 1 HR, 2 RBI
  • Michael LorenzenPitching6.0 IP, 2 ER, 7 K
White Sox
  • Miguel VargasBatting1-3, 1 HR, 3 RBI
  • Mike VasilPitching3.1 IP, 2 ER, 1 K

Scoring summary

  • 9Robert Jr. grounded into fielder's choice to second, Benintendi scored, Quero out at second, Vargas to third.7–5
  • 9Quero singled to right, Meidroth scored, Vargas to second, Benintendi to third.7–4
  • 9Vargas walked, Tauchman scored, Benintendi to second, Meidroth to third.7–3
  • 9Witt Jr. homered to left center (415 feet), India scored.7–2
  • 9India singled to left, Waters scored.5–2
  • 7Garcia singled to right, India scored.4–2
  • 7India doubled to left, Waters scored.3–2
  • 4Perez homered to left center (403 feet), Pasquantino scored.2–2
  • 1Vargas homered to left (372 feet), Tauchman scored.0–2

The pick

Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.

Royals 52%

Toss-upHit
KC 52%CHW 48%

Forecast Elo ratings alone

How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 50–55% have won 52.7% of 2,871 graded games.

Market
KC 52%
ML KC -120 / CHW +100
Pre-line forecast
KC 57%
Elo + market-implied
Elo ratings
KC 57%
Ratings vs. market
+5.0 pts
KC: Elo 57.1%, market 52.2%
Fair odds
KC -109
CHW +109 · the forecast as odds, no margin
Pregame projection
KC 4.8 – 4.7 CHW
Margin from the forecast, posted total 9.5

How the number is built

Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.

FactorKCCHWWhy
Team rating14981418Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average
Home field—+18Worth 18 Elo in MLB
Starting pitchers−10+2KC: Michael Lorenzen: team allows 0.48 more runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts) · CHW: Mike Vasil (no track record yet)
Elo ratingsKC +50 EloKC 57.1%
Market-implied ratingsKC 56.4%Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context
Pre-line forecastKC 56.5%15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend)
ForecastKC 52.2%Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate

Tale of the tape

This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest.

Try another venue →
Kansas City Royals and Chicago White Sox compared, with each team's league rank
KCStatCHW
27th of 303.4Runs scored3.526th of 30
5th of 303.5Runs allowed4.319th of 30
20th of 30−0.2Margin−0.823rd of 30
19th of 304–6Last 105–514th of 30
22nd of 3014–19Road vs home16–1722nd of 30
11th of 301501Opponent Elo150015th of 30
20th of 301498Elo rating141829th of 30

Rating history

Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.

RoyalsWhite Sox
13501400145015001550league averageAprJulOctJanAprJulOct

Against the line

How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.

This seasonKCCHW
Run line31–3439–26
Last 104–68–2
Favorite8–230–1
Underdog23–1139–25
Overs–unders26–3932–33
Overs–unders, last 106–45–5

Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.

Head to head

KC 23–9 CHW in their last 32 meetings; the forecast called 25 of 32.